Forbes Censoring An Article About WHO Fake Pandemic

[Drareg]

Forbes posted this article in 2010 on the WHO faking a pandemic, they have now censored it because it doesn’t fit the unscientific hysterical covid cult narrative, the censoring is now blatant amongst the media outlets, it’s easily done seen as they are all owned by a few billionaires and tied into the council on foreign relations, essentially the ruling class global university.
https://evidencenotfear.com/why-the-who-faked-a-pandemic-forbes/

 

[tankasnowgod]

Forbes removing their own content could hardly be called "censoring." Forbes has always been a publisher, not a platform, so it could always be their choice to remove something they created. They could have done so for many reasons, though no doubt it was in some way a reaction to the current climate.

Far from Forbes "censoring," this could have been done under pressure from some government organization, or on the advice of their legal department. This might actually be case of Forbes being censored (as opposed to doing the censoring), or reacting to the fear of being censored. Though in many ways, these multinational org and government seem to be different tentacles of the same beast.

 

[Lejeboca]

This might actually be case of Forbes being censored (as opposed to doing the censoring)

Censor others in ways that you yourself would find censored -- Golden rule of today.

 

[Geronimo]

Forbes removing their own content could hardly be called "censoring." Forbes has always been a publisher, not a platform, so it could always be their choice to remove something they created. They could have done so for many reasons, though no doubt it was in some way a reaction to the current climate.

Far from Forbes "censoring," this could have been done under pressure from some government organization, or on the advice of their legal department. This might actually be case of Forbes being censored (as opposed to doing the censoring), or reacting to the fear of being censored. Though in many ways, these multinational org and government seem to be different tentacles of the same beast.

I very much agree with the last part. They were apparently bought out in 2013. They rebought the company and then sold majority control to a Chinese company. So who knows where their allegiances lie. But to think whoever buys a publisher isn't going to scrub all the articles they find undesirable would be foolish.