encerent
Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 609
To get lean should I go no fat, or should I keep some coconut oil, maybe 3-4 tablespoons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Just about everything that goes wrong, involves free fatty acids increase. If they're totally saturated fatty acids, such as from coconut oil and butter, those are less harmful, but they still tend to shift the mitochondrial cellular metabolism away from using glucose and fructose, and turning on various stress-related things (by lowering the carbon dioxide production, I think, is the main mechanism).
I agree with this. My experience has been the same. Macros don't matter in terms of losing or gaining weight. But I have found that that macros do have an effect on the water weight I hold (which is part of weight loss, I guess.) When I go too low in fat, my face and eyes get puffy, and I lose definition.Calories are what matters. You can drop your fat to 5 grams per day and still gain weight ( fat ) if your eating too much. Keeping your sugars high to keep thyroid up is very important. I can maintain my weight on 5% calories from fat @ 2800 calories, but if I add 2-3 tbsp of hydrogenated coconut oil my body weight starts going down, seemingly because of the increase in metabolism. Basically the higher the metabolism the more you can eat and either maintain or lose weight ( fat ). Calories are still the end all be all. This has been a passion of mine for over 10 years, and I still find it strange that people think its about macronutrients specifically, not calories. Ya, adjusting the macronutrients can allow for more calories to be eaten, but at some point you can screw up your weight loss with too many calories. Find a diet you enjoy, then experiment with how many calories you need on that specific diet to maintain your weight ( through trial and error ) then either eat a little less than maintenance, or eat at your maintenance and burn extra calories through exercise, preferably walking and strength training. Best of luck!
Calories are what matters. You can drop your fat to 5 grams per day and still gain weight ( fat ) if your eating too much. Keeping your sugars high to keep thyroid up is very important. I can maintain my weight on 5% calories from fat @ 2800 calories, but if I add 2-3 tbsp of hydrogenated coconut oil my body weight starts going down, seemingly because of the increase in metabolism. Basically the higher the metabolism the more you can eat and either maintain or lose weight ( fat ). Calories are still the end all be all. This has been a passion of mine for over 10 years, and I still find it strange that people think its about macronutrients specifically, not calories. Ya, adjusting the macronutrients can allow for more calories to be eaten, but at some point you can screw up your weight loss with too many calories. Find a diet you enjoy, then experiment with how many calories you need on that specific diet to maintain your weight ( through trial and error ) then either eat a little less than maintenance, or eat at your maintenance and burn extra calories through exercise, preferably walking and strength training. Best of luck![/QU
Yes, you are absolutely correct....best of luck to you too!Calories are what matters. You can drop your fat to 5 grams per day and still gain weight ( fat ) if your eating too much. Keeping your sugars high to keep thyroid up is very important. I can maintain my weight on 5% calories from fat @ 2800 calories, but if I add 2-3 tbsp of hydrogenated coconut oil my body weight starts going down, seemingly because of the increase in metabolism. Basically the higher the metabolism the more you can eat and either maintain or lose weight ( fat ). Calories are still the end all be all. This has been a passion of mine for over 10 years, and I still find it strange that people think its about macronutrients specifically, not calories. Ya, adjusting the macronutrients can allow for more calories to be eaten, but at some point you can screw up your weight loss with too many calories. Find a diet you enjoy, then experiment with how many calories you need on that specific diet to maintain your weight ( through trial and error ) then either eat a little less than maintenance, or eat at your maintenance and burn extra calories through exercise, preferably walking and strength training. Best of luck!
I agree with this. My experience has been the same. Macros don't matter in terms of losing or gaining weight. But I have found that that macros do have an effect on the water weight I hold (which is part of weight loss, I guess.) When I go too low in fat, my face and eyes get puffy, and I lose definition.
I'm not sure exactly why it happens. Probably because of how it effects the GI system. Low fat compromises my digestion. And with compromised digestion, there isn't proper assimilation of energy and nutrients. Probably resulting in a stressed system, hence the swelling.Why do you think that happens? does not make sense that to low fat makes you puffy?
@tyler thats very interesting. Are calories also the same? You dont drop total kcals when going higher fat?
What have you found as the threshold? How low % of fat calories before puffyness happens?
I may be wrong with this reasoning, but here I go!
I feel as though the body doesn't convert and store sugar as fat as easily as it stores dietary fat. I am under the impression that de novo lipogenesis (the conversion of carbohydrate to fat) is not a very strong pathway in humans and that it takes quite an excess of carbohydrates before any meaningful amount of fat made. If someone eats a mixed meal of carbohydrates and fat, the body will more likely store the fat from the meal and use the carbohydrate as energy.
If this is true, then one could simply eat very low fat (like under 10g) and high carbohydrate (like 500g) as well as a decent protein. Walking uses fat as fuel so if you had such a diet and also walked like 1 hour a day you would burn something like 400 calories of fat (or 44g of fat) from the walk (if the walking calorie calculator is correct, which it probably isn't) plus whatever else you burn through the day (depending on your calorie intake).
If you're going to try and get into the EFAD range (1g PUFA or lower... or so... depending on how much AA you eat) then you could add HCO to the mix. In the studies I read on essential fatty acid deficiency, the rats given hydrogenated coconut oil lost more weight than the zero fat diet. HCO seems to amplify EFAD, which is not surprising since we know saturated fat displaces PUFA (as Ray has talked about). Animals on an EFAD diet can actually eat more calories than the regular animals yet lose more weight, suggesting that they are burning calories like crazy.