Fluoride to be added to all UK Tap Water

P

Peatness

Guest
No mention of the plan to add more to it with fluoride


Scientists are concerned that the allowable levels of toxic PFAS - known as "forever chemicals" - in UK drinking water are too high.
A BBC study found PFAS levels exceeded European safety levels in almost half of the samples taken. However, none exceeded the current UK safety level.
 
P

Peatness

Guest

GodsHound

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Messages
267
About a month ago I was telling someone that I was feeling unwell after taking a shower. Months before, I thought it was a blood sugar issue, now I am I am worried it is more serious than that.

What’s up with this ‘watch the water’ thing? I skimmed through and just gleamed vaccine toxicity stuff. What has it got to do with water supplies?
 
P

Peatness

Guest
Just found out that aluminum sulfate is used in tap water treatment.


 
P

Peatness

Guest

Government responded

This response was given on 14 October 2021

Water fluoridation is a safe and effective public health measure to improve oral health. Public consultation will be an important part of the process ahead of introducing any new schemes.

Tooth decay is a significant public health problem in England, yet it is largely preventable. Poor oral health impacts people of all ages and their carers. It can cause pain and suffering and affect an individual’s ability to function in and enjoy day to day life. It can affect children’s ability to learn, thrive and develop and in older and more vulnerable populations, poor oral health may ultimately impede their ability to nourish themselves and communicate.
It also has an economic impact. More frequent visits to the dentist means absence from school and from work for patient parents, guardians or carers and for adults themselves when they need treatment. In addition, there is an impact on the NHS. For, example, in 2019-20, 35,190 children aged 0-19 years in England were admitted to hospital for the extraction of decaying teeth, the cost of which was estimated to be £54.6 million. The vast majority will be preventable and will be diverting much needed NHS resources away from other areas.
Fluoride is naturally present throughout the natural world including in water supplies and in some foods. There are also areas of the country where levels of fluoride in drinking water are naturally at similar levels to those seen in artificial fluoridation schemes
Global research and monitoring of the effects of water fluoridation specifically in England demonstrates the benefits of this public health measure. We have known since the 1930s that access to fluoride in drinking water is associated with a reduced level of dental decay. There has been a large volume of individual studies published since this was first discovered using a wide variety of research methods. Recent reviews of this extensive scientific literature, by a number of authoritative bodies across the world, have concluded that levels of tooth decay are lower in fluoridated areas and that there is no credible scientific evidence that water fluoridation is harmful to health.
Whilst tooth decay can be prevented or minimised by adherence to a healthy diet and by regular toothbrushing and engaging with dental services, its prevalence remains higher among the most disadvantaged who may face difficulties in eating healthily. Regular toothbrushing and attendance at the dentist are also less prevalent in poorer or more disadvantaged groups.
Water fluoridation, which has both topical and systemic effects, is the only intervention to improve dental health that does not require sustained behaviour change over many years. It is therefore particularly beneficial for individuals and communities at increased risk of tooth decay, such as those from more deprived backgrounds and other vulnerable groups including those with physical or mental disability that prevent them from effectively caring for their teeth.
The benefits are clear, however it remains important that those people in areas where new schemes are proposed are effectively consulted. That is why the Health and Care Bill, which will give Secretary of State the power to directly introduce, vary or terminate water fluoridation schemes also provides that populations will continue to be consulted on any proposed new schemes.

Department of Health and Social Care

Here is a mind blower - Where Does The Fluoride That's Added To Our Drinking Water Come From?​


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fWhPV7op3Sag/
 

cs3000

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2022
Messages
599
Location
UK
probably not a great idea to force a neurotoxic substance on a population, Taurine protects from flouride toxicity

~ 500mg - 1g human dose, 500mg has similar efficacy.

Neuroprotective influence of taurine on fluoride-induced biochemical and behavioral deficits in rats - PubMed
The present study investigated the neuroprotective mechanism of taurine by evaluating the biochemical and behavioral characteristics in rats exposed to sodium fluoride (NaF) singly in drinking water at 15 mg/L alone or orally co-administered by gavage with taurine at 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight for 45 consecutive days.
flouride taurine.png


Results showed that taurine administration prevented NaF-induced locomotor and motor deficits. The taurine mediated enhancement of the exploratory profiles of NaF-exposed rats was supported by track and occupancy plot analyses. Moreover, taurine prevented NaF-induced increase in hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation levels but increased acetylcholinesterase and the antioxidant enzymes activities in the hypothalamus, cerebrum and cerebellum of the rats.
Collectively, taurine protected against NaF-induced neurotoxicity via mechanisms involving the restoration of acetylcholinesterase activity and antioxidant status with concomitant inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the brain of rats.


-> MDA level shows lipid peroxidation which f*cks up cell membranes


They used 15mg/L drinking water in the study. but in the arsenic drinking water mice study they had to use 5x more arsenic at 50ppb to replicate 10ppb in drinking water for human equivalent, due to their metabolism. so i suspect with rats it's similar and the 15mg/L would be lower human equivalent. which makes it closer than it seems to the 1.5mg/L "limit" set by the UK standards


oral taurine also protects against mercury toxicity as a bonus even in doses as low as ~60mg human dose, so still worth taking on the lower end if high doses 500mg+ aren't well tolerated emotionally Hepatoprotective effects of taurine against mercury induced toxicity in rats - PubMed

taurine mercury.png

60mg human dose completely reversed lipid peroxidation, restored glutathione

also protective in the brain at the same dose https://www.researchgate.net/public..._INDUCED_TOXICITY_IN_THE_BRAIN_TISSUE_OF_RATS
 
Last edited:

FrostedShores

Member
Joined
May 27, 2022
Messages
235
Location
Virginia, United States
probably not a great idea to force a neurotoxic substance on a population, Taurine protects from flouride toxicity

~ 500mg - 1g human dose, 500mg has similar efficacy.

Neuroprotective influence of taurine on fluoride-induced biochemical and behavioral deficits in rats - PubMed
The present study investigated the neuroprotective mechanism of taurine by evaluating the biochemical and behavioral characteristics in rats exposed to sodium fluoride (NaF) singly in drinking water at 15 mg/L alone or orally co-administered by gavage with taurine at 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight for 45 consecutive days.View attachment 41486

Results showed that taurine administration prevented NaF-induced locomotor and motor deficits. The taurine mediated enhancement of the exploratory profiles of NaF-exposed rats was supported by track and occupancy plot analyses. Moreover, taurine prevented NaF-induced increase in hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation levels but increased acetylcholinesterase and the antioxidant enzymes activities in the hypothalamus, cerebrum and cerebellum of the rats.
Collectively, taurine protected against NaF-induced neurotoxicity via mechanisms involving the restoration of acetylcholinesterase activity and antioxidant status with concomitant inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the brain of rats.


-> MDA level shows lipid peroxidation which f*cks up cell membranes


They used 15mg/L drinking water in the study. but in the arsenic drinking water mice study they had to use 5x more arsenic at 50ppb to replicate 10ppb in drinking water for human equivalent, due to their metabolism. so i suspect with rats it's similar and the 15mg/L would be lower human equivalent. which makes it closer than it seems to the 1.5mg/L "limit" set by the UK standards


oral taurine also protects against mercury toxicity as a bonus even in doses as low as ~60mg human dose, so still worth taking on the lower end if high doses 500mg+ aren't well tolerated emotionally Hepatoprotective effects of taurine against mercury induced toxicity in rats - PubMed

View attachment 41487
60mg human dose completely reversed lipid peroxidation, restored glutathione

also protective in the brain at the same dose https://www.researchgate.net/public..._INDUCED_TOXICITY_IN_THE_BRAIN_TISSUE_OF_RATS
Time to stock up on taurine! Thanks for this!
 
P

Peatness

Guest
Thames water is making smart water meters compulsory!


Boroughs in London​

Barnet, Bexley, Brent, Bromley, Broxbourne, Camden, City of London, City of Westminster, Croydon, Dartford, Ealing, Elmbridge, Enfield, Epping Forest, Epsom and Ewell, East Hertfordshire, Greenwich, Hackney, Hammersmith and Fulham, Haringey, Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Kingston upon Thames, Lambeth, Lewisham, Merton, Newham, Redbridge, Richmond upon Thames, Sevenoaks, Southwark, Spelthorne, Tandridge, Tower Hamlets, Waltham Forest, Wandsworth.

Districts outside London​

Guildford, Mole Valley, Swindon, Waverley
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom