External Peer Review of RT-PCR Test Reveals 10 Flaws at Molecular & Methodological Level

amd

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
864
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

This model was based on the assumption that the novel virus is very similar to SARS-CoV from 2003 as both are beta-coronaviruses.

The PCR test was therefore designed using the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV as a control material for the Sarbeco component; we know this from our personal email-communication with [2] one of the co-authors of the Corman-Drosten paper. This method to model SARS-CoV-2 was described in the Corman-Drosten paper as follows:

“the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

The Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is an important biomolecular technology to rapidly detect rare RNA fragments, which are known in advance. In the first step, RNA molecules present in the sample are reverse transcribed to yield cDNA. The cDNA is then amplified in the polymerase chain reaction using a specific primer pair and a thermostable DNA polymerase enzyme. The technology is highly sensitive and its detection limit is theoretically 1 molecule of cDNA. The specificity of the PCR is highly influenced by biomolecular design errors.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
1,100
Finally, someone with vast in-field knowledge dismantles this colossal travesty. How long do you think until the pharma's, gvt's and scientific community pull their heads out of their asses and this whole ridiculous charade begins to end? Probably not that soon, certainly not before they profit from the scam vaccine they cooked up.
 
OP
A

amd

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
864
Not long ago they scared people worldwide with the Zika virus and wanted to poison us with pesticides.

#1 Zika virus (ATCC® VR-84) <= see that TM right there
Comments - Accidental infection has occurred in laboratory personnel
Source - Blood from experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey, Uganda, 1947
Name of Depositor - J. Casals, Rockefeller Foundation


#2 Doctors in Argentina with a group called "Physicians Against Fumigated Towns" came out with a report that said Brazil had started using pyriproxyfen in drinking water a few months before health officials began noticing an increase in newborns with small heads.

#3 Health authorities blamed the Zika virus for the new cases of
microcephaly.
A 2012 outbreak of acute encephalitis syndrome in Bangladesh has been linked to the use of pesticides — some of
which are banned in the country — in lychee orchards, according to a study published in the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

#4 How many times can you fool people?
 
Last edited:
OP
A

amd

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
864
this whole ridiculous charade begins to end? Probably not that soon, certainly not before they profit from the scam vaccine they cooked up.

That's their MO. That's why they are in a rush to push the vaccines, before poeple notice the vaccines cause more harm than the disease (a repeat of the 1976 swine flu fiasco).

The common theme is the spread of the disease/condition via the vaccine/pesticide to create a self-feeding crisis, justifying government intervention (not excluding eugenics).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom