Earth Becoming Greener Due To Increased CO2

[burtlancast]

taking an inside view where you think you're smart or someone else is smart and knows more than and expert without being able to tell the experts why they get something wrong in a way they'd agree with (or at least some of them would) is a cognitive pitfall that is extremely common amoung the population and amplified across a number of domains amoung conspiracy theorists and people in these types of threads. Your response is simply "There are smart people here and scientists are idiots. Yay us! Right guys? See! These guys agree with me so you're wrong!"

Here are two debates between David Ray Griffin and 2 defenders of the official 911 fairy tale: here and here.

Even though one would assume that after more than 13 years and eight 911 books, the official "experts" would jump at the chance of exposing Griffin's "conspirational views", those 2 defenders aren't government employees ; they are a journalist and a fellow theologian priest.

And it becomes very clear reading them on which side reasoning and critical thinking resides; not on the side of the defenders of the official version.

This puts into perspective why no official government "expert" ever accepted a public debate with Griffin.

All those grandstanding "experts" criticizing official narrative' dissenters are reduced using jaa's empty rhetorics of "conspiratorial thinking" because when challenged in an open discussion , they prove themselves unable to back up a single word of it.