Bodhi
Member
Do you believe this conspiracy ?
NO is do not believe in gluten and PUFA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Do you believe this conspiracy ?
I think you misunderstand when I used the terms "lens" and "paradigm" and "philosophy." We couldn't be having this conversation now if you weren't filtering out all kinds of information that is coming in. People don't realize they are doing it, but they do realize it on a larger scale like with an overarching philosophy about how the world works. Just hitting the keys on your keyboard is tacitly admitting that you believe in the reproducibility of material phenomena and the objective nature of it, or else you would question whether the keys are fake and your text is appearing because of magic.Ok Bro that's great
You're a taoist, right? Or Buddhist or whatever. Correct me if I'm wrong. That region has been mired in slavery for the past 2,000 years precisely because of its enabling belief systems. My "lens" as you call it is self-belief, I believe in myself. How do caged animals escape from a pen, do they formulate an abstracted philosophy or simply trust their instinct? Look at all the amazing things nature accomplishes, does it do so by thinking every move and questioning every reaction? Of course not. We were put here, whatever that means to you, to be fully human. That's my religion, that's what I believe in: myself. You say Ray has barely influenced culture. He's healed and completely changed the lives of countless thousands, tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of people. What have you done?I think you misunderstand when I used the terms "lens" and "paradigm" and "philosophy." We couldn't be having this conversation now if you weren't filtering out all kinds of information that is coming in. People don't realize they are doing it, but they do realize it on a larger scale like with an overarching philosophy about how the world works. Just hitting the keys on your keyboard is tacitly admitting that you believe in the reproducibility of material phenomena and the objective nature of it, or else you would question whether the keys are fake and your text is appearing because of magic.
I'm not a taoist or buddhist.You're a taoist, right? Or Buddhist or whatever. Correct me if I'm wrong. That region has been mired in slavery for the past 2,000 years precisely because of its enabling belief systems. My "lens" as you call it is self-belief, I believe in myself. How do caged animals escape from a pen, do they formulate an abstracted philosophy or simply trust their instinct? Look at all the amazing things nature accomplishes, does it do so by thinking every move and questioning every reaction? Of course not. We were put here, whatever that means to you, to be fully human. That's my religion, that's what I believe in: myself. You say Ray has barely influenced culture. He's healed and completely changed the lives of countless thousands, tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of people. What have you done?
lolNO is do not believe in gluten and PUFA
I'm not a taoist or buddhist.
Caged animals don't have abstract thought, but they do discriminate on reality through their sensory input to make decisions about what is important. For example, they know to ignore shape compared to smell and taste for what to eat, or ignore smell when it comes to where it's safe to walk (avoiding something sharp, or a hole in the ground). They have a lens that they integrate their sensory input, some of which is innate and most of which is learned very quickly.
The rest of what you said, attacking me because I committed the sin of suggesting Ray Peat isn't radically changing the world because he's not engaging in it to the fullest degree he could, is...I don't know, just an emotional lashing out by you I guess. I'm 32, he's 80. Did he heal and change hundreds of thousands of lives (retarded estimation by the way, I'd like you to find 100 people that will say he actually saved their lives) by the time he was 32? Or are you just being an ***hole? For what it's worth, the reason I went back and got a PhD in nutritional biochemistry was to do the kinds of things I'm talking about. So wtf are you doing, other than talking ***t on the forum?
Here's what I'm suggesting, that doing something like Haidut (even if some of his supplements aren't perfectly Ray Peat formulated), and even taking it a step further and directly challenging the medical cartel, is the way to change the world. Have you heard of Cody Wilson, the guy who invented the 3D-printable pistol and sells a milling machine to make AR10/15 high powered lower receivers? He's challenging the very concept of political life and how it interacts with people who physically make things but producing and distributing these things. The printing press directly challenged the church, which was the primary and in some cases only institution that reproduced written works before the press was invented. This allowed to break the hold the church had on all of society's information. In order to change the medical situation, someone has to take the chance with their life to challenge the cartel in that direct way, anything less is exactly that, less. Less than a potential for revolutionary change. If the printing press guy just wrote about how a machine could reproduce text, and we didn't need a monopoly by monks on copying documents, that's great. What's more great is actually making it and changing the reality on the ground.
The problem is in taking what I said, that Peat has effected things less than he could, to mean he has not at all effected things. So yeah, of course anything any of us do is partly due to him, the same way as Gilbert Ling may have inspired a few people if he quit 30 years earlier, it's all relative. The original commenter was implying that acting in the real world is someone a negative, and that sitting at home and writing is the ultimate achievement of a person.Don't forget Haidut,yourself and others are using the addition of Peat lense to your lenses, Peat is a good seed for change, we live in different times to Peat when he was our age,he also discovered most of his bets work in biology later in life I believe,Peats work takes the work of others and hones it to a very coherent magnifying glass in short books and articles,he is influencing.
Those who speak of human nature on here without discussing the lense of reality,the functionilism of the pattern,are crackpots looking to assert moral hardness.
He says "do you know how hard it is..." not that's he is horny. Joe Biden lost his wife and daughter in a car crash and this girl reminds him of her.
He then says good "little" girl, not good "lookin'" girl as the subtitles claim.
My bad on the taoist or buddhist.I'm not a taoist or buddhist.
Caged animals don't have abstract thought, but they do discriminate on reality through their sensory input to make decisions about what is important. For example, they know to ignore shape compared to smell and taste for what to eat, or ignore smell when it comes to where it's safe to walk (avoiding something sharp, or a hole in the ground). They have a lens that they integrate their sensory input, some of which is innate and most of which is learned very quickly.
The rest of what you said, attacking me because I committed the sin of suggesting Ray Peat isn't radically changing the world because he's not engaging in it to the fullest degree he could, is...I don't know, just an emotional lashing out by you I guess. I'm 32, he's 80. Did he heal and change hundreds of thousands of lives (retarded estimation by the way, I'd like you to find 100 people that will say he actually saved their lives) by the time he was 32? Or are you just being an ***hole? For what it's worth, the reason I went back and got a PhD in nutritional biochemistry was to do the kinds of things I'm talking about. So wtf are you doing, other than talking ***t on the forum?
Here's what I'm suggesting, that doing something like Haidut (even if some of his supplements aren't perfectly Ray Peat formulated), and even taking it a step further and directly challenging the medical cartel, is the way to change the world. Have you heard of Cody Wilson, the guy who invented the 3D-printable pistol and sells a milling machine to make AR10/15 high powered lower receivers? He's challenging the very concept of political life and how it interacts with people who physically make things but producing and distributing these things. The printing press directly challenged the church, which was the primary and in some cases only institution that reproduced written works before the press was invented. This allowed to break the hold the church had on all of society's information. In order to change the medical situation, someone has to take the chance with their life to challenge the cartel in that direct way, anything less is exactly that, less. Less than a potential for revolutionary change. If the printing press guy just wrote about how a machine could reproduce text, and we didn't need a monopoly by monks on copying documents, that's great. What's more great is actually making it and changing the reality on the ground.
Interestingly, you used the overall context of my writing and not the amount of prepositions I included or the average length of the sentences to receive a meaningful communication.My bad on the taoist or buddhist.
3d printing firearms will accomplish nothing against the state. the only reasons we are allowed firearms is to either to practice to enter the mililtary and be the world's police or, soon, to kill each other: gangs, militias, &etc. The last time the regular man had the ability the fight the state was during the era of muskets and cannon, and what happened? We were fooled by the american revolution because simps believed enough in ideology to make the lie possible; most people didnt have the correct information and, as always, those who did had the crowd against them.
You want people to be impressed with you, and I'd be impressed if you made some cogent point pertaining to the debate, but you don't.
Everybody does that... rich people get to do it at home.
Around two hours in to this JRE episode with Jordan Peterson he starts talking about the necessity of dogma to exist in the world. He's a really brilliant guy and explains it a lot better than I do.
Around two hours in to this JRE episode with Jordan Peterson he starts talking about the necessity of dogma to exist in the world. He's a really brilliant guy and explains it a lot better than I do.
Around two hours in to this JRE episode with Jordan Peterson he starts talking about the necessity of dogma to exist in the world. He's a really brilliant guy and explains it a lot better than I do.
That's for sure.The episode isn't about Rogan's beliefs but this other guy's, who is in the spotlight now for refusing to use the new gender pronouns as a professor. The last hour is the best part about beliefs, but earlier on is good too. Peterson makes the comment that perhaps the University, as in the place one goes for universal knowledge, no longer exists in the halls called universities or colleges but is instead on the internet.