j. said:narouz said:One angle I've been thinking about is
what is the optimal time to run the lights
considering energy consumption and cost.
If I'm using a total of 900watts, that is a lot of money on the ole electric bill.
Peat has said that short periods of intense exposure may be better than long periods of low-wattage exposure.
He has also said something to the effect that most of the benefits occur in under an hour.
I'm wondering whether--especially on a budget--one could do pretty well
dosing oneself intensely for, let's say, 3 or 4 x 1/2hour exposures...?
I recall Peat saying brief exposures of high intensity every hour is good.
Well, that would be one cost-cutting approach.
I don't think I've seen him say "every hour" though.
He might've!
I just don't think I've seen that.
Just something more vague like
"brief intense exposure may be more beneficial than constant exposure of a low-watt bulb."