I want to raise a certain paradox in Peat's view of hormone-driven hairloss.
I keep seeing dozens of posts on Mesorx and Reddit where Proviron and Masteron users report immediate and heavy hairloss, at a rate that is unseen with other steroids.
They also almost always report prostate irritation and increased nightime need to urinate.
What's more, heavily aromatizing AAS such as Dbol, Deca and MENT don't seem to affect much the hair of those users, making Peat's theory of e2 being responsible for hairloss somewhat dubious.
What differentiates proviron and masteron from DHT is a methyl group. Could that explain all the difference ?
Could anyone reconcile Peat's view with those users' experience in a way that makes sense ?
I keep seeing dozens of posts on Mesorx and Reddit where Proviron and Masteron users report immediate and heavy hairloss, at a rate that is unseen with other steroids.
They also almost always report prostate irritation and increased nightime need to urinate.
What's more, heavily aromatizing AAS such as Dbol, Deca and MENT don't seem to affect much the hair of those users, making Peat's theory of e2 being responsible for hairloss somewhat dubious.
What differentiates proviron and masteron from DHT is a methyl group. Could that explain all the difference ?
Could anyone reconcile Peat's view with those users' experience in a way that makes sense ?
Last edited: