Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
He has botox in his fore head for a start
Haha I wouldn't be surprised. I was actually thinking he looks quite different recently, I had put it down to a haircut but maybe it is this. I cant tell if someone has used botox myself.
He has said before that "it would be a bad look for the field if I died early" so maybe he's also getting some botox to help with his "anti aging solutions" marketing. I find that kind of hilarious for some reason.
He has said before that "it would be a bad look for the field if I died early"
That makes me immediately lose confidence in him. I get the impression that he wants to live longer for spite because of this. If he is worried about looking bad from something happening too soon that he is supposed to be actively knowledgeable about working against, I lose some faith as it seems he is just putting up a front to ensure his image is good and remains solely to prove others wrong -- meaning he appears to have less confidence in his "craft" or such; and is playing things by ear more than practical application/means/etc.
That would be like me claiming to be a bridge fixer who claims to know how to stop bridges from falling as people walk across. I then begin walking across a bridge and say, "Hopefully this doesn't fall or I'll look bad by dying!" -- or better a surgeon saying they hope to not get a random, shaky hand right before surgery.
That makes me immediately lose confidence in him. I get the impression that he wants to live longer for spite because of this when the real goal is to live longer to do better for yourself and others; to enhance existence/refine meaning with boundless life. If he is worried about looking bad from something happening too soon that he is supposed to be actively knowledgeable about working against, I lose some faith as it seems he is just putting up a front to ensure his image is good and remains solely to prove others wrong -- meaning he appears to have less confidence in his "craft" or such; and is playing things by ear more than practical application/means/etc.
That would be like me claiming to be a bridge fixer who claims to know how to stop bridges from falling as people walk across. I then begin walking across a bridge and say, "Hopefully this doesn't fall or I'll look bad by dying!" -- or better a surgeon saying they hope to not get a random, shaky hand right before surgery.
I think this is reading a bit much into a single comment of his. I think he wants to live longer and healthier for all the basic, selfish reasons that everyone does. However it would be bad marketing for him to die early, and he honestly acknowledges that. Which I respect.
I think its a good idea to have a critical attitude to internet health or "science" gurus, though. Even better, to look at the science they are producing / citing - if the evidence adds up, thats all that matters. However it's human nature to put people in black and white boxes of either "benevolent, all knowing prophet" and "evil, lying trickster". I don't think David Sinclair is necessarily an evil lying trickster, despite his ideas being counter to Ray Peats (benevolent all knowing prophet).
Yeah, I get what you mean. I know and do not think black and white -- always keep an open mind to some degree.
I don't write off any angles on the discussion of life extension or health or etc. -- I'm even subscribed to companies that have been associated with Sinclair anyways.
I wouldn't put him past Peat, but it might be interesting to look at it from all angles, i.e., reading both Peat's material and Sinclair's too.
Plus even if you want to call some degrees of pursuit "snake oil" like, at the very least it unveils more possibilities and "fills the gaps" you could say as you continue learning/applying/etc.
In other words it is probably worth it to follow and be open to all interpretations. I just meant that I lost faith, i.e., didn't feel any more inclined or driven to think of Sinclair as more or equally as competent as Peat than default I guess. I guess I did maybe look too in to that.