haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
Another good study showing that our lifestyle choices directly affect our future children, despite what the morons in white coats keeps repeating. It has been known for years that dads in poorer health tend to beget more sickly children but the explanation had always been genetic - i.e. the dad was sick because of his poor genes and those genes got passed on to his offspring. The study below shows that, in addition to genes, sperm carry epigenetic information from father to offspring acquired while the sperm mature in the dad's testicles. That epigenetic information determines DNA methylation patterns in the child and those methylation patterns affect the offspring's health throughout his/her life. Furthermore, the study found that it was the process of "shedding" and then "reacquiring" the epigenetic information during the sperm maturation process that was vital for male fertility. Without that process, sperm was not able to fertilize an egg and generate an embryo, despite having an intact and identical DNA across all stages of maturation. I have seen a few studies showing that a person's health is akin to a weighted average of the events of a person's own life (contributing about 40% of the total effect) plus the combination of the health status of his/her parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents. The transmission of transgenerational epigenetic information does not stop at 3 generations and can go for more than 14, but the last 3 contribute the most to a person's current state of health. Apparently, one of the most affected "biomarkers" of life that gets passed on epigenetically is metabolic health, as one of the studies below mentions. And if metabolism is affected (positively or negatively) then this will likely have an effect on every aspect of health.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/...assed-down-for-at-least-14-generations.16935/

Aside from solidifying the evidence that a dad's lifestyle choices and environmental conditions (over which the dad sometimes has no control) play a huge role in the offspring's health, the study also has implications for the IVF industry. Apparently, the timing of harvesting sperm matters a lot for the offspring's health, due to those changes in epigenetic information during the maturation process. If immature sperm is being used then this would potentially have huge and negative influence on offspring's health. This is quite different from what IVF doctors promote, claiming that the DNA in sperm is the only thing that matters for a child's health. The article is quick to claim that apparently most IVF cases use mature sperm, but you see, even if problematic sperm were used in some IVF cases the advances in medicine should be able to correct that. I wonder how many IVF children's health has been ruined due to this DNA-centric incompetence...These people will probably spend their lives blaming themselves and never even suspect what is responsible for their poor health.

Sperm tsRNAs contribute to intergenerational inheritance of an acquired metabolic disorder
https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(18)30541-0
Dads Pass On More Than Genetics in Their Sperm | Science | Smithsonian

"...Eat poorly, and your body will remember—and possibly pass the consequences onto your kids. In the past several years, mounting evidence has shown that sperm can take note of a father’s lifestyle decisions, and transfer this baggage to offspring. Today, in two complementary studies, scientists tell us how."

"...One of the most powerful members of the epigenetic toolkit is a class of molecules called small RNAs. Small RNAs can conceal genetic information from the cellular machinery that carries out their instructions, effectively ghosting genes out of existence. The legacy of a dad’s behavior can even live on in his child if his epigenetic elements enter an embryo. For instance, mice born to fathers that experience stress can inherit the behavioral consequences of traumatic memories. Additionally, mouse dads with less-than-desirable diets can pass a wonky metabolism onto their kids."

"...In their work, Sharma and Conine noted that, in mice, while immature testicular sperm contain DNA identical to that of mature sperm, immature sperm relay different epigenetic information. It turns out that sperm small RNAs undergo post-testes turnover, picking up intel on the father’s physical health (or lack thereof) after they’re manufactured, but before they exit the body. However, the exact pit stop at which these additional small RNAs hitch a ride remained unknown."

"...Sharma was surprised to find that many small RNAs seemed to be discarded or destroyed upon entering the early epididymis; then, the newly vacated sperm reacquired epigenetic intel that reflected the father’s state of being, boasting a full set by the time they left the late epididymis. There was only one possible source for the small RNA reacquisition: the cells of the epididymis—which meant that cells outside of the sperm were transmitting information into future generations."

"...In her work, Sharma had noted that while the epigenetic cargo of testicular sperm and late epididymal sperm differ vastly, they had a few groups in common—but these small RNAs were evicted from sperm as they entered the epididymis, then reacquired from the cells along the meandering duct. Though bookended by success, the early epididymal flop was the only stage that lacked these elements—and the only stage incapable of generating an implantable embryo. To test if these particular small RNAs were the key to fertility, the researchers pulled small RNAs out of the late epididymis and injected them into embryos fertilized with early epididymal sperm. To their amazement, these embryos not only implanted, but also yielded mouse pups—indistinguishable from embryos fertilized by late epididymal sperm. The early epididymal sperm was defective, but not irreversibly so. This hinted that the deficiency wasn’t a fluke, but a normal part of the journey through the epididymal labyrinth. In other words, on the path to maturation, males were breaking sperm, then repairing the damage. “It’s very bizarre to see them lose [viability] and gain it back,” says Sharma. And the utility of this back-and-forth remains entirely enigmatic. But whatever the reason, it’s clear that sperm vary enormously along the length of the reproductive tract."

"...This comes with a small caveat. It wasn’t until 1978 that the first baby was successfully born of an IVF procedure—and though thousands have followed since, this generation is still young. As of yet, there’s no reason to suspect any negative consequences of in vitro versus natural conception; as this population ages, researchers will continue to keep close tabs. Since the majority of IVF procedures are performed with mature sperm that have cleared the late epididymis, Rando is not concerned. And, in the unlikely case that there are repercussions to using testicular or epididymal sperm in these procedures, Rando remains hopeful that future work will enable scientists to restore the necessary information immature sperm might lack. Someday, addressing epigenetics may be key to enhancing assisted reproduction technology—and ensuring that sperm are as mature as they come."
 

Prosper

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
516
I wonder how pervasive the influence of father's lifestyle on epigenetics is: is an averagely gifted person who reads a lot and actively challenges their brain in a variety of ways more likely to create offspring that are highly capable of abstract thinking? Will a lifelong marathon runner give birth to children who are more fit to run long distances, or will their children be less fit due to the stressful lifestyle that routinely running long distances translates to?
 

Yggr

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
64
Would one correctly assume that this holds true for women as well?
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
I wonder how pervasive the influence of father's lifestyle on epigenetics is: is an averagely gifted person who reads a lot and actively challenges their brain in a variety of ways more likely to create offspring that are highly capable of abstract thinking? Will a lifelong marathon runner give birth to children who are more fit to run long distances, or will their children be less fit due to the stressful lifestyle that routinely running long distances translates to?

If you believe in Lamarckian evolution, then yes, both of these situations should result in a dad passing his intellectual and physical achievements to the offspring. That is what recent studies seem to suggest happens. Genes are probably nothing but a long term evolutionary "memory" that serves just as a "suggestion" for how an organism might want to develop, but these suggestions always take second place to the current environment the organism lives in. The fact that some people are visibly more resilient to stress and disease and seemingly got this from their parents, does NOT prove a genetic component. It just suggests a heritable component of health, which is perfectly consistent with Lamarckian evolution and if it lasts for 14+ generations then it can easily be misjudged for a genetic component. However, so far no gene for "smarts" or "muscles" has been discovered. Not even a set of core genes, and not even a network of anything less than all genes. All genes affect all other genes, and as far as health, brains, power, etc it is probably not even stemming from genes but mostly from epigenetic/methylation patterns.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/...-again-genomic-medicine-likely-useless.24533/
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
Lamarck's work is being somewhat vindicated after all this time, it seems.

About time, not sure how much longer the genetic dogma can continue to waste billions and still survive intact. In 80+ years of research and more than a trillion in funding it has produced basically nothing of even remote value to human health, lifespan, or even quality of life.
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
Would one correctly assume that this holds true for women as well?

Yes, and the epigenetic imprinting may be even stronger from the mother's side. Peat has written many times about how prenatal stress imprints the child for his/her entire life. The first 9 months (in the uterus) are crucial and everything the mother does, eats, drinks, and experiences has a profound effect on the child. Some more recent studies found the first 1,000 days since conception are the most crucial ones. So, basically time spent in utero + the first 2-3 years of life.
 

Waynish

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
2,206
There are certain traditions passed down in various lineages that optimize for offspring health & robustness. I've personally seen in men who practice some of these that their kids are definitely above average weight at birth (despite having small asian mothers - and no, there weren't problems during birth due to size) :P
 

Yggr

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
64
@haidut Thank you, so the usual Peat recommendations would hold true to maximize health, longevity and adaptability of the offspring during this 3 year period and by the parents? Additionally let’s say one was trying for children, would it be wise to have say a 6 month period of correcting health etc as much as possible perform conceiving?

@Waynish What traditions would those be?
 

Hans

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Messages
5,856
Yes, and the epigenetic imprinting may be even stronger from the mother's side. Peat has written many times about how prenatal stress imprints the child for his/her entire life. The first 9 months (in the uterus) are crucial and everything the mother does, eats, drinks, and experiences has a profound effect on the child. Some more recent studies found the first 1,000 days since conception are the most crucial ones. So, basically time spent in utero + the first 2-3 years of life.
What if the mother experiences abuse from the husband while the baby is still in the womb. Would the baby be "damaged" for the rest of its life and have to make extra sure nutrition and everything is on point just to be as healthy as someone who didn't experience such trauma? Or is such "damage" reversible?
 

bdawg

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
292
Location
Sydney, Australia
Fckin amazing

If this doesn't give you optimism on how to control evolution and your own destiny (limited by circumstances), I don't know what else does

@haidut if sperm RNA can change its coding based on the external environment, surely all cell RNA can?
 

Prosper

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
516
What if the mother experiences abuse from the husband while the baby is still in the womb. Would the baby be "damaged" for the rest of its life and have to make extra sure nutrition and everything is on point just to be as healthy as someone who didn't experience such trauma? Or is such "damage" reversible?
I remember reading that the type of stress determines the outcome. While chronic stress leads to poor outcomes, intermittent stress leads to children with higher testosterone and IQ.
 
L

lollipop

Guest
If you believe in Lamarckian evolution, then yes, both of these situations should result in a dad passing his intellectual and physical achievements to the offspring. That is what recent studies seem to suggest happens. Genes are probably nothing but a long term evolutionary "memory" that serves just as a "suggestion" for how an organism might want to develop, but these suggestions always take second place to the current environment the organism lives in. The fact that some people are visibly more resilient to stress and disease and seemingly got this from their parents, does NOT prove a genetic component. It just suggests a heritable component of health, which is perfectly consistent with Lamarckian evolution and if it lasts for 14+ generations then it can easily be misjudged for a genetic component. However, so far no gene for "smarts" or "muscles" has been discovered. Not even a set of core genes, and not even a network of anything less than all genes. All genes affect all other genes, and as far as health, brains, power, etc it is probably not even stemming from genes but mostly from epigenetic/methylation patterns.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/...-again-genomic-medicine-likely-useless.24533/
This is a great response. Highlighting it for when people read this thread and maybe missed it.
 
L

lollipop

Guest
What if the mother experiences abuse from the husband while the baby is still in the womb. Would the baby be "damaged" for the rest of its life and have to make extra sure nutrition and everything is on point just to be as healthy as someone who didn't experience such trauma? Or is such "damage" reversible?
I believe your scenario is accurate and would require extra work. I believe most things are reversible with enough intelligent, informed effort EVEN deformed, very crooked spines/hard tissue.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
1,045
There are certain traditions passed down in various lineages that optimize for offspring health & robustness. I've personally seen in men who practice some of these that their kids are definitely above average weight at birth (despite having small asian mothers - and no, there weren't problems during birth due to size) :P

What things if you don't mind sharing?
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
@haidut Thank you, so the usual Peat recommendations would hold true to maximize health, longevity and adaptability of the offspring during this 3 year period and by the parents? Additionally let’s say one was trying for children, would it be wise to have say a 6 month period of correcting health etc as much as possible perform conceiving?

@Waynish What traditions would those be?

Yes on all of these. I think upping pregnenolone, aspirin, niacinamide and maybe a little DHEA for 3-6 months before conceiving can be very protective. These are all OTC chemicals so should not be an issue to obtain. For more severe cases, thyroid, progsterone, anti-serotonin chemicals, etc may also have to be considered. Keeping pregnenolone intake during pregnancy should also be helpful against general stress-driven imprints on the offspring, assuming the doctor is OK with it.
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
What if the mother experiences abuse from the husband while the baby is still in the womb. Would the baby be "damaged" for the rest of its life and have to make extra sure nutrition and everything is on point just to be as healthy as someone who didn't experience such trauma? Or is such "damage" reversible?

If there is any stress, including fatherly abuse, then it will likely have an effect. It should be reversible but the measure to reverse it should match the severity of the stress "imprint". So, after the baby is born I guess some tests for thyroid function and measuring temps regularly would help. Also, severely impacted babies tend to now grow well. If the baby is below the 50% in height/weight by the time he/she is 6 months old then I't take this as an indication that something is off. The imprint continues after birth too, so limiting the abusive father influence is important, at least for the first 2-3 years.
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
Fckin amazing

If this doesn't give you optimism on how to control evolution and your own destiny (limited by circumstances), I don't know what else does

@haidut if sperm RNA can change its coding based on the external environment, surely all cell RNA can?

Yes, of course. I always thought that the idea of an organism depending entirely on its DNA and thus losing a lifetime of experience interacting with its environment is a stupid idea. Nothing in nature is lost and all experience, both good and bad is accounted for in the cell memory. In many cases the change in RNA composition is very quick, on the order of hours/days, which should give a lot of optimism for reversing chronic diseases if the external circumstances are right.
 
Back
Top Bottom