Covid Vaccines : Databases of Reported Adverse Events (for the US, the EU and the UK)

[Giraffe]

Covid RNA Vaccines: Close to 1000 Post-Vaccination Deaths – Swiss Policy Research (swprs.org)

Published: February 6, 2021

Data from vaccine adverse event reporting systems in the US (VAERS), the EU (EUDRA) and the UK (MHRA) indicates that covid RNA vaccinations have already been associated with close to 1000 deaths and several thousand non-trivial ‘adverse events’, including anaphylactic (allergic) shocks, temporary facial paralysis, and, in a few cases, birth defects. These figures may be an underestimate, as vaccine reporting systems typically cover only a fraction of adverse events.

For the US, see: 501 Deaths + 10,748 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine (The Defender)

Links to the official data:

US (VAERS)
EU (EUDRA)
UK (MHRA)

 

[Kozak]

Covid RNA Vaccines: Close to 1000 Post-Vaccination Deaths – Swiss Policy Research (swprs.org)



Links to the official data:

US (VAERS)
EU (EUDRA)
UK (MHRA)

Thanks

 

[Giraffe]

Thanks

 

[Giraffe]

There's a WHO database, too.

VigiAccess

 

[Giraffe]

According to the data from VigiAccess, the WHO database, worldwide 40% of those who suffered adverse reactions after vaccination with the Pfizer stuff were age group 18 to 44 years. 74% of those suffering adverse reactions were female.

 

[Peatness]

French drug assessment center demands removal of all four widely used COVID vaccines​

French drug assessment center demands removal of all four widely used COVID vaccines | News | LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

 

[Giraffe]

From that article above:

"April 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A regional independent drug assessment center, the CTIAP (Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques), which is linked to the Cholet public hospital in the west of France, recently published a report showing that the vaccines used against COVID were not only submitted to insufficient clinical testing, but that the quality of the active substances, their “excipients, some of which are new,” and the manufacturing processes are problematic. “These new excipients should be considered as new active substances,” the Cholet hospital team stated, in a study that according to them raises issues that have not been commented to date."

"According to the CTIAP, all of the vaccines were put on the market and actively used on human beings before “proof of quality for the active substance and the finished product” was produced: all the manufacturing labs obtained future deadlines to submit their studies in this regard."

"The authors of the report consider that the “variabilities, which impact the very core of the product, could even invalidate any clinical trials conducted” in the coming months and years."

"[...] in the case of serious adverse effects, including deaths, and in order to establish the said “causal link” with certainty, the victims and their families are often powerless when faced with the requirement of “probatio diabolica” [a legal requirement to achieve an impossible proof]."

.....

They raise very important questions. When someone gets injured from one of the vaccines they are quick to say that it's just a coincidence, and that this sort of injury was not observed during the trials. This is absolutely bogus. Mass productions comes with its own issues, such as contaminants, and since it is a new technology they do not have much experience with it. Add to this that part of the vaccines are produced by partners that are known to have quality problems. The stuff that is administered to millions of people does not have the same quality as that one used in the trials.

A German cell biologist discussed some of these questions when she was interviewed by the German Corona-Ausschuss.

Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger -- Hearing # 37 of German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee

"We know that normally vaccine development takes a very long time. It’s not just the clinical phase: with this vaccine, it’s set at three times two and a half years, i.e., three phases of 2.5 years each plus the evaluation phase, which makes 7 ½ years in total. And then one shouldn’t forget that the production optimisation is also important, at least a year would surely be needed for that. That hasn’t taken place at all. The vaccine is already being sold and used, but the production optimisation isn’t yet by any means completed. And there are considerable deficiencies."

She also explains quite detailed why lipid nanoparticles are toxic to the cells.

 

[Peatness]

UK MHRA Yellow Card reporting system is not adequately managed. This is extensively discussed in UK column's new on 2 Feb 2022 starting @10mins

Covid injection injuries is being buried

UK Column News - 2nd February 2022

www.ukcolumn.org

 

[Peatress]

Why is the MHRA hiding critical safety data on the covid vaccines?

They are still withholding the crucial pregnancy outcomes data

wherearethenumbers.substack.com