Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Exactly who is it that's dying? No one is dying from covid. I'll try to find a link I posted showing that 6 or 7 research labs tested 1,500 people and only found influenza A or B. We are being lied to constantly. I keep repeating this but the CDC has admitted no proof of covid exists.
@haidut I think this study was seriously flawed in that they only followed the women for roughly 2.5 months (Dec 14, 2020 - Feb 28, 2021). This means that many of the first trimester group were still carrying or may have received their vaccine on the very last day of the study window. This means that additional adverse events are missed and the proportion could be much higher. The 12 births in the first and second trimester group that were “successful” are likely premature births.
What we need to know are the final outcomes of these study participants. This means expanding the study window through at least a nine month period for all participants in the original group.
Can you please answer DHTSUPREME? I also want to know why supposedly the unvaccinated are dying. What’s going on wit this? This encouraged my step father to get the first shot and I held him off for so long!I agree, and that's why I said the 88.8% miscarriages in my post is probably a lower bound estimate. In fact, come to think of it, I find it weird that they reported miscarriages, congenital abnormalities, vaccines, etc over time periods that do not overlap well. I mean, they surely have the data on say what percentage of women miscarried if they got the vaccine in the first, second, or third trimester, right? And the lack of follow up for the women who got vaccinated late is also quite suspicious, but still even with the lower bound estimate on miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy events it is quite a scary study despite the poor design.
I will give me a few minutes…Can you please answer DHTSUPREME? I also want to know why supposedly the unvaccinated are dying. What’s going on wit this? This encouraged my step father to get the first shot and I held him off for so long!
One thing to consider is that the CDC has deliberately manipulated the results of COVID deaths and infections between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. They did this by lowering the cycle threshold to 28 for the PCR test used on vaccinated individuals (source: COVID-19 Breakthrough Case Investigations and Reporting | CDC).Nearly all COVID deaths in US are now among unvaccinated
Nearly all COVID-19 deaths in the United States now are in people who weren’t vaccinated, a staggering demonstration of how effective the vaccines have been and an indication that daily deaths — now down to under 300 — could be practically zero if everyone eligible got the shots.apnews.comCOVID-19 Vaccines
Vaccines are seen as one of the best ways to stop COVID-19. Learn more about the types of vaccines, including the newly approved Novavax.www.webmd.comU.S. COVID Deaths Are Rising Again. Experts Call It A 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated'
Reversing a months-long downward trend, deaths from COVID-19 have begun rising steadily this week. More than 99% of the recent fatalities were among people who had not been vaccinated.www.npr.org
I keep hearing this statistic that 98-99% of people currently dying in the US from Covid is the unvaccinated. A lot of people in the midwest where the population is least vaccinated are dying. I want to know if this statistic is flawed and why. If there are no flaws in that statistic then for the sake of my older family members I may have to rethink my stance on it
I'm not trusting of it and believe there will be more evidence to why it's not as good as it seems. But since the delta variant is stronger and the vaccinated appear to not be dying like the unvaccinated then I may have to consider recommending it to older family members
If I wanted more control, I wouldn't kill the sheep that do as I say (the vaccinated). I would kill or hurt the ones that aren't doing what I say (the unvaccinated). Does that make sense? Btw I'm not vaccinated and I'm not planning to be. Just a bit confused
Look back to all the covid deaths last year for your answer. They lied through their teeth. Big payouts from Medicaid if they listed covid. Hospitals were empty. We have all of this on previous threads. People die all the time but not from a fictional disease.Nearly all COVID deaths in US are now among unvaccinated
Nearly all COVID-19 deaths in the United States now are in people who weren’t vaccinated, a staggering demonstration of how effective the vaccines have been and an indication that daily deaths — now down to under 300 — could be practically zero if everyone eligible got the shots.apnews.comCOVID-19 Vaccines
Vaccines are seen as one of the best ways to stop COVID-19. Learn more about the types of vaccines, including the newly approved Novavax.www.webmd.comU.S. COVID Deaths Are Rising Again. Experts Call It A 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated'
Reversing a months-long downward trend, deaths from COVID-19 have begun rising steadily this week. More than 99% of the recent fatalities were among people who had not been vaccinated.www.npr.org
I keep hearing this statistic that 98-99% of people currently dying in the US from Covid is the unvaccinated. A lot of people in the midwest where the population is least vaccinated are dying. I want to know if this statistic is flawed and why. If there are no flaws in that statistic then for the sake of my older family members I may have to rethink my stance on it
I'm not trusting of it and believe there will be more evidence to why it's not as good as it seems. But since the delta variant is stronger and the vaccinated appear to not be dying like the unvaccinated then I may have to consider recommending it to older family members
If I wanted more control, I wouldn't kill the sheep that do as I say (the vaccinated). I would kill or hurt the ones that aren't doing what I say (the unvaccinated). Does that make sense? Btw I'm not vaccinated and I'm not planning to be. Just a bit confused
Hi Haidut I don't trust the vaccine and this further confirms I'm not crazy for feeling this way. But what's up with the statistics that show the majority of people dying from Covid currently are the unvaccinated? It appears to be the vaccine does not reduce the rate of infection but does reduce the symptoms and chance of dying
Appreciate the efforts you make to deduce truth from the reports and studies you come across. All the reporting agencies and the government and tech giants are remarkably united in disseminating only the accepted medical information while either suppressing or discrediting any opposing views. In the face of such a cohesive biased effort it is getting harder and harder to ascertain truth. I remember that Ray basically said in an interview with you and Danny that those in power are far more evil in their intentions than we assume.The statistics are biased, because CDC apparently stopped tracking COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated. So, if they only track COVID-19 in the unvaccinated then by definition all COVID-19 deaths reported will be in unvaccinated people.
I saw a post by Alex Berenson that the data posted on the @israelmoh telegram account. I cannot get a picture to download. Go to Alex’s page on Twitter.Haidut, on the reuter's site that you provided for the Israeli data, no where does it state that most of the covid deaths are linked to vaccinated people. Where did you read that?
What is the official reason for doing so? I mean there must be an official reason/excuse to get away with it without too many questions being askedOne thing to consider is that the CDC has deliberately manipulated the results of COVID deaths and infections between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. They did this by lowering the cycle threshold to 28 for the PCR test used on vaccinated individuals (source: COVID-19 Breakthrough Case Investigations and Reporting | CDC).
The excuse is that it’s for sequencing purposes. However there are clinical guidelines now being used to AVOID testing vaccinated individuals unless symptoms are present (example here: https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/guidance/outbreakmanagementguidance/PCR weak results guidance.pdf). When symptoms are present they use a <= 28 Ct which is too weak to detect the virus in most cases.What is the official reason for doing so? I mean there must be an official reason/excuse to get away with it without too many questions being asked
I saw this when it was initially published, and I don't believe they gave any reason whatsoever. But there was an indication that the cycle count was unchanged for non-vaccinated people.What is the official reason for doing so? I mean there must be an official reason/excuse to get away with it without too many questions being asked
I saw this when it was initially published, and I don't believe they gave any reason whatsoever. But there was an indication that the cycle count was unchanged for non-vaccinated people.
Scary title, but that's what the data shows assuming my calculations are correct. I saw this study/article by accident while I was checking Google News for my daily dose of propaganda. At the top right corner was a "debunking" article about a viral Twitter post claiming that pregnant women who get the COVID-19 vaccines before the 20th week of their term had 82% spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) rate. The "debunking" article (posted below) immediately condemned the post as a lie and kept repeating that the study showed ~13% total (across the entire term) spontaneous abortion rate and the usual word salad that "expert agree the vaccine is safe for pregnant women, yada, yada,.." as well as the usual "Experts reviewed the study and found the social media claims to be false."
However, if you look at the actual study, a much scarier picture emerges. There were 827 total completed pregnancies among vaccinated women. Of those 115 failed (104 spontaneous abortions, 1 stillbirth, 10 other pregnancy loss). Out of the total of 712 successful pregnancies, 700 occurred in women who took the vaccine in the third (last) trimester. That means only 12 successful pregnancies in women who took vaccine in first or second trimester. Also, 96 of the 104 abortions occurred in women who took the vaccine in first or second trimester. So, if only 12 pregnancies in that group were successful, that means the spontaneous abortion rate in women who took the vaccine in first or second trimester is 96 / (96+12) = 88.8%, which is higher than the 82% the Twitter user reported. Worse still, this is a lower bound since the 96 spontaneous abortions occurred before the 13 weeks, while the 12 successful pregnancies before the 3rd trimester vaccinated women are spread from week 0 to 26. So, if there are additional abortions that occurred between weeks 13 and 26 then the percentage of spontaneous abortions is likely even higher than 88.8%. Check Table 4 in the third link below for more info on the study findings.
Am I missing something in this analysis?
@Drareg @Regina @tankasnowgod @boris @Giraffe
US study used to falsely link Covid-19 shots, miscarriages
Social media posts claim a study by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientists determined that those vaccinated against Covid-19 early in pregnancy suffered miscarriages at a rate of 82 percent. But the report found no signs of vaccine safety problems in pregnant people, and...factcheck.afp.com"...Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%). A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester. Adverse outcomes among 724 live-born infants — including 12 sets of multiple gestation — were preterm birth (60 of 636 among those vaccinated before 37 weeks [9.4%]), small size for gestational age (23 of 724 [3.2%]), and major congenital anomalies (16 of 724 [2.2%]); no neonatal deaths were reported at the time of interview. Among the participants with completed pregnancies who reported congenital anomalies, none had received Covid-19 vaccine in the first trimester or periconception period, and no specific pattern of congenital anomalies was observed. Calculated proportions of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes appeared similar to incidences published in the peer-reviewed literature (Table 4)."Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons | NEJM
Original Article from The New England Journal of Medicine — Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Personsperma.cc
I agree, and that's why I said the 88.8% miscarriages in my post is probably a lower bound estimate. In fact, come to think of it, I find it weird that they reported miscarriages, congenital abnormalities, vaccines, etc over time periods that do not overlap well. I mean, they surely have the data on say what percentage of women miscarried if they got the vaccine in the first, second, or third trimester, right? And the lack of follow up for the women who got vaccinated late is also quite suspicious, but still even with the lower bound estimate on miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy events it is quite a scary study despite the poor design.
Thanks for the sources. Yep, they want to bias the test data against the unvaccinated or else they would have made it the same limit for all tests. So now a lab has to work 2 streams of testing and all tests have to indicate whether the person has been vaccinated or not. An interesting side question would be: are the 2 streams using the same PCR primers?CDC Specifies PCR Test Cycle Threshold For Vaccinated Individuals: What Does This Mean?
May 4, 2021 IN BRIEF The Facts:The CDC is and will be collecting samples from COVID tests of vaccinated individuals to try and determine if the virus can breakthrough the protection of the vaccine.…rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com
CDC: maximum 28 CT for post-vaccine COVID PCR tests - The Sentinel
A 28 CT is recommended to avoid false positives on people who have been vaccinated, but not on everyone else.sentinelksmo.org
Haidut, on the reuter's site that you provided for the Israeli data, no where does it state that most of the covid deaths are linked to vaccinated people. Where did you read that?