COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Essentially Pointless

[mayku-T-meelo]

It could be the combination of different factors. More people in the vaccine group took pain- and fever medication which would mask symptoms. Unofficial unblinding. What's up with this high number of reinfections? "Symptoms" and "adverse events" overlap quite a bit. Could it be that symptoms have been taken as adverse events and a number of participants have not been tested for SARS-CoV-2?

View attachment 23471

(link)

Interesting. So in the study people got tested only if they self-reported a symptom?

 

[Nemo]

The researchers warn of a “cautionary tale” from efforts to create an HIV vaccine over a decade ago, where a promising vaccine candidate actually increased the risk of some men catching the virus.

Missed this one. Thanks for posting.

 

[Giraffe]

Interesting. So in the study people got tested only if they self-reported a symptom?

Pfizer argued that they couldn't have tested everyone every week or so. Participants were asked to contact someone if they had certain symptoms, and in the first weeks after a shot they were asked to fill in an e-diary to record adverse events.

Covid surveillance is described in section 8.13.

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

 

[mayku-T-meelo]

Pfizer argued that they couldn't have tested everyone every week or so. Participants were asked to contact someone if they had certain symptoms, and in the first weeks after a shot they were asked to fill in an e-diary to record adverse events.

Covid surveillance is described in section 8.13.

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Thanks, that could explain some things, there's a lot of loops. And there was also still not many covid cases in both groups considering the amount of people involved, so they could easily omitt a lot of people from the "vaccinated" group just because they were biased and not worried of their health status after experiencing adverse events. I'm thinking that people who took part in the study were already believers, so some of those who realized they didn't get the real deal after no adverse events were already too over-cautious for every symptom that could mean covid. Pfizer also mentioned it's not feasible to keep track of people for the years to come. "Experimentation" is practically continuing on population as we speak but with no experimental setting and no repercussions, it's such a mess.

 

[area51puy]

Pfizer Vaccine Batches in the EU Were Placebos, Say Scientists – The Daily Sceptic

Scientists have uncovered startling evidence that many of the batches of the Pfizer vaccine deployed in the EU may have been placebos – and the regulator knew this and did not subject them to quality-control testing.

dailysceptic.org

Scientists have uncovered startling evidence that a substantial portion of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine deployed in the European Union may in fact have consisted of placebos – and that the German regulator knew this and did not subject them to quality-control testing.​

As he explains, it represents the batch that was the used the most in Denmark, with somewhat over 800,000 doses having been administered. These 800,000 doses are associated with around 2,000 suspected adverse events, which gives a reporting rate of one suspected adverse event per approximately 400 doses. As Dyker puts it, “That’s not a small amount if we compare to what we know otherwise from influenza vaccines.” According to Dyker’s calculation, the green batches account for more than 60% of the Danish sample.

There are then the ‘blue batches’ clustered around the blue line, which are obviously associated with an extraordinarily high level of adverse events. As Dyker notes, no more than 80,000 doses of any of the blue batches were administered in Denmark – suggesting that these especially bad batches may perhaps have been quietly pulled from the market by public health authorities.

Nonetheless, these batches had as many as 8,000 suspected adverse events associated with them. Eight thousand out of 80,000 doses would give a reporting rate of one suspected adverse event for every 10 doses – and Dyker notes that some of the blue batches are indeed associated with a reporting rate of as high as one suspected adverse event for every six doses!

On Dyker’s calculation, the blue batches represent less than 5% of the total number of doses included in the Danish study. Nonetheless, they are associated with nearly 50% of the 579 deaths recorded in the sample.

Finally, we have the ‘yellow batches’ clustered around the yellow line, which, as can be seen above, barely gets off the x-axis. On Dyker’s calculation, the yellow batches represent around 30% of the total. Dyker notes that they include batches comprising some 200,000 administered doses which are associated with literally zero suspected adverse events.

As Dyker puts it, “malicious” observers might note that “this is how placebos would look”.

And malicious observers might be right. For Dyker and Matysik compared the batch numbers contained in the Danish study with publicly available information on the batches approved for release, and they made the startling discovery that almost none of the harmless batches, unlike the very-bad and not-so-bad batches, appear to have been subject to any quality-control testing at all.



View: https://rumble.com/v2wx3w0-bombshell-one-in-three-pfizer-vaccine-shots-may-have-been-a-placebo.html