next on my reading list:
Psychological Warfare and the New World Order
Psychological Warfare and the New World Order
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
A world where everyone is in a peaceful, altruistic and anti-authoritarian place, I understand
Recognizes that their place, the human place in life is to love and be loved.
"Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins."
"My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you."
Even worse than what I was expecting lol
In what way is anarchist philosophy ideal? I can't think of it as anything other than completely degenerative....
No, hierarchy is a description of reality and not simply a projection of one's beliefs onto reality. Authority is absolutely is necessary for a functional society. How would you even go about enforcing laws without the authority to do so?
A family follows a rather simple hierarchy. The child obeys the mother. The mother obeys the father. The father obeys God. This has been the case for thousands of years at least. The idea of a "family unit" is a modern phenomenon...
How does one goes from standing by the king to promoting socialism? You did say generally so I take it there was those who truly believe in royalty then?
Can you explain why workers should have a say of how a business that doesn't belong to them should be run?
Hierarchy is more a snap shot of reality via the limited human senses, they all decay and must be rebuilt, without knowing all of reality and what it is we can only assume for now, nothing is closed, it’s only temporary forms that will change.
The child sees the mother and father as a metaphor, encouragements and ushering can work if intelligence is there, when intelligence is lacking people us authoritarianism.
You're saying hierarchy is limited snap shot of reality because it decays and is rebuilt? What society can you think of that has no hierarchical structure whatsoever? What you mean the child see the mother and the father as a metaphor? There is intelligence disparity between the child ( prior reaching puberty) and the parents. There's also an intelligence disparity between men and women though not as blatant between a child and his parents. Are you suggesting the mother and father don't have authority over their children?
My guess is the parents can act authoritatively, dictate with the threat of punishment or they can lead via analogy, by example, there is a difference here IMO, being authoritative can cause rigidity in the child, if the child isn’t inclined to follow the example set then the parents should be energetically adaptable to offer another.
Is breastfeeding for example a rigid hierarchy,it doesn’t seem to be as the child moves on from it via development, it’s the child that creates the desire in the mother to breastfeed in most cases, the child also cries when hungry.
Hierarchy for me is questionable because it’s a system with effect from the top down but also the bottom up and everything in between, the common interpretation is it’s top down control ,It’s seems to be system that develops from scarcity of energetic resources in the environment. It’s a feedback loop that inevitably must change because it’s a process.
Low intelligence in the parents and lower socioeconomic status makes it difficult to do anything other than be authoritative it seems.
Human perception perceives a process in development and describes it as a hierarchy which implies rigidity, entropy and negentropy to maintain structure is a broader phenomenon we currently don’t understand fully but my guess is it’s not a hierarchy but a sea of infinite potential, potential for forms ,information drawn in via our structure that we describe with the word hierarchy.
Rigidity is temporary, changing, I think the problem is more the refusal to recognize this earlier as a natural process and allow systems to evolve sooner, we cling to them for too long and we need authoritarianism to do that.
The standards and morals evolve and change, it was morally and legally acceptable in the past to engage sexually with kids from 12 years of age, this wasn’t so long ago.
The breast feeding doesn’t necessarily need a mother as we have changed/evolved to the point a machine could feed the baby daily, in the past the mother was essential and could walk away, now we have social services that can assist, it’s no longer an absolute certainty as it would have been in the past.
We still can’t negate the desire the child induces in the mother and it’s effect, a capacity to induce desire is power, attraction.
Overall I just don’t see the benefits of how hierarchies in general are perceived, they are seen as systems to fight and die for rather than accept change.
The potential for any form that we can perceive in our evolved structure, it’s open to change with time or possibly get worse.
I’m not trying to defame anyone, I haven’t specified individual names, I’m not getting into another long back and forth if it descends into this, good day.
You yet again portray rigidity and authority as bad while portray "evolution" and change as good. Why do you keep doing this? Its like you're ignoring what I have said and sticking your head in the sand. Systems and change are opposed to one another by their very existence. Systems needs order to operate which implies an unchanging rigid state and predictability and structure. Change is the opposite of order and breeds chaos where no system can come into existence as nothing can have a define structure. It appears you're hellbent to oppose law and order. Am I mistaken in my observation?
What does "evolve" means in the context you're using it in? If it means to change then it is redundant to use it in the same sentence that you use the word change. Morals that change are not a good thing. For there to be morals there is a need for there to be a moral truth and truth is rigid and is objective. If your morals are changing and subjective then you do not have morals.
It is funny you mention the morality of having sex with those of the age of 12. I have written on the topic many times in youtube comments that ultimately didn't go anywhere since they refused to see the truth. I can link to them if you want but I shall give a summary of my views. The current views of sexual morality are very wrong and essentially rejects reality while at the same time brings harm to society. Anyone capable of procreating and moral agency should not in any circumstances be considered a child or kid, to do otherwise is simply wrong. I can elaborate further or link to comment threads where I gave more details of my views on the matter if you desire....
To be quite frank with you, what you just said in this paragraph makes me sick and churns my stomach. To call this appalling would be giving it the highest form flattery. The thought you would dare suggest that a machine can replace the mother is maddening. This right here is why rigidity is necessary and changing moral standards is really nothing more than moral degeneracy in disguise. Replacing the mother with "social services" is almost as sickening and all the reason any sane person would need to oppose any left leaning ideology but insanity has the whole world in its grasp....
"We"? You clearly were referring to me and not yourself. Either way, I wasn't trying negate anything besides you implying change is good and being rigid is bad. Rather telling that you're elevating the baby while at the same degrading the mother. If I didn't know any better I would say you have some insidious motives...
It is more like you simply reject the good of hierarchies since it goes against your worldview rather than hierarchies are not good. What do you think of Lucifer's defiance against God? From what I've read of your views, I'll say you're much closer in align with Lucifer than with God and I want to see if I am mistaken or not....
You keep using that "evolve" word again. Change is not constant. There is something satanic about believing that change is constant while rigidity is temporary. Being constant implies not being subject to change while temporary means being subject to change. You emphasis on change while at the same being dismissal of rigidity, structure and form isn't a sign of anything good...
If you had no desire of a confrontational discussion with me then you really shouldn't use a public forum. Anything you say in a public forum will be contested when someone strongly disagree with you and that someone is me at the moment. This closing statement comes off as you having no way actually refuting anything I've said and wish to exist the conversation as quickly as possible. As someone who should be concern of finding the truth, your actions are that of a coward. It is disappointing to see someone of your prestige actually having such a putrid character. If this is to be the end of our conversation then I shall take my leave then...
There is a paradox behind all perceptions including what we perceive as change, from our current understanding we could discuss them ad nauseam, Using analogy doesn’t mean I practice said analogies or desire them.
The morality behind discouraging sex with kids is about preserving their development for energetic capacity via growth, this benefits humanity more,
most coherent morals have this process underlying them,
as the context of the environment changes and allows for growth of more structure via resources the morals will change accordingly
With regard to the potential of turning up at the gates of heaven and being presented with the choice of Lucifer or God I’m going to ask if there’s a third option available
neither of them impress me that much
according to the texts they are both happy to kill people.
I have no prestige on here in my mind, being on here has thought me to see what is dialectic and what is rigid, I don’t have time to entertain everyone’s rigidity they can only shake off by experience, saying I have prestige implies I’m authoritative which I’m not.
I don’t like woke politics, they will fail, they are delusional, those with the access to the most energetic resources and capacity to maintain them win, that’s the ruling class.