A few weeks ago I posted an op-ed in the prestigious BMJ discussing how the COVID-19 vaccines trials are almost pointless as they are not designed to test if the vaccines would prevent development of COVID-19, exacerbations of COVID-19, hospitalizations, or deaths. The trials were apparently designed to test only whether the vaccine would lower risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2.
In that post above, I mentioned that the public health authorities are, of course, ignoring the trial design and gaslighting the public every chance they get that the vaccines are the key to safety. Now, a CNN article states directly that the vaccines do not really prevent infection but again claims that they prevent developing COVID-19. Again, the latter claim is NOT based on any evidence and none of the vaccine trials provide evidence for such claims. I guess the more interesting part here is this - if CNN is now admitting that the vaccines do not really prevent infection (which was the primary goal of the vaccine trials conducted so far) then what "benefit" are these vaccines supposed to provide???
"...Covid-19 vaccines prevent illness, but do not necessarily prevent infection. If someone tests positive and doesn't get sick, the vaccine has worked as intended. If someone tests positive within a few weeks of receiving the second dose, it may be because the vaccine hasn't yet fully kicked in."
Ironically, the CNN article is about a politician who got infected with SARS-CoV-2 after getting both vaccine shots. I guess the house of cards is starting to shake/collapse, so CNN and MSM are quick to change the narrative even if the new narrative is a blatant lie...
@Drareg @tankasnowgod @boris @Giraffe @Regina
COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Essentially Pointless
...because they won't tell us if the vaccines can prevent deaths or serious COVID-19 complications, or virus transmission between people. If you think I am trolling, check out the CNN and BMJ articles below - that is exactly what they are saying. If that is the case, then I do not see what is...
raypeatforum.com
In that post above, I mentioned that the public health authorities are, of course, ignoring the trial design and gaslighting the public every chance they get that the vaccines are the key to safety. Now, a CNN article states directly that the vaccines do not really prevent infection but again claims that they prevent developing COVID-19. Again, the latter claim is NOT based on any evidence and none of the vaccine trials provide evidence for such claims. I guess the more interesting part here is this - if CNN is now admitting that the vaccines do not really prevent infection (which was the primary goal of the vaccine trials conducted so far) then what "benefit" are these vaccines supposed to provide???
Massachusetts Democratic congressman, vaccinated for Covid-19, tests positive for virus
Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, who has been vaccinated for Covid-19, tested positive for the virus on Friday afternoon and remains asymptomatic, according to his spokeswoman.
www.cnn.com
Ironically, the CNN article is about a politician who got infected with SARS-CoV-2 after getting both vaccine shots. I guess the house of cards is starting to shake/collapse, so CNN and MSM are quick to change the narrative even if the new narrative is a blatant lie...
@Drareg @tankasnowgod @boris @Giraffe @Regina
Last edited: