whodathunkit
Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 777
WOW. I am SO disappointed in this response by someone who so obviously considers himself a master of reality, facts, and argument in general.Women were instigating for the vote and being a part of American politics in the 19th century, notably in the temperance movement that became the prohibitionist movement and amendment.
I've written at length before on this forum about sexual politics and how total war and total state are an expression of over-reaching feminism, even when executed by men. Have you never experienced the following: girl gets pissed off at someone, gets boyfriend to beat them up?
That's the female strategy, to organize men to perform the violence necessary for their political or social ends. Now, a lot of the intellectuals behind communism were men (mostly Jewish) but again I believe that the ideology and tactics are on the feminine side of sexual politics, involving saying "nice" things like "we're going to give everyone free such and such." It's a nice thing to say, but it never works out, and it leaves out the part of who you're going to rob from to get it. Harsh truths, like "there are no free lunches" are more male political statements, flowery language and ideals are more female. At least that's how I see it, and it's because females evolved without having to work for the resources but were kept safe by men and had resources brought to them, and manage the home. So it makes sense that a feminine political outlook would not take into consideration how you obtain the resources, but just focuses on how to use them (whether they exist or not).
What a disingenuous, side-stepping, obtuse response to my last post.
Speaking of obtuse, this bit really came out of left field:
Have you never experienced the following: girl gets pissed off at someone, gets boyfriend to beat them up?
Talk about a red herring.
Did some girl get her BF to beat you up, Kyle? Is that where all your issues with women come from?
I can't for the life of me figure out why you would use some statement like that to try to answer my last post.
At any rate, IIRC correctly, it was the Marxists and socialists who started all the crap about free lunch and we're going to give you free stuff. When considering the abundant damage done to the republican and capitalists ideals of the West, women's "instigations" in temperance and suffrage in the 19th century are so minor as to be inconsequential when simultaenously considering the damage done by the burgenoning Marxist and Socialist movements.
You have to know this and yet you still cling to your one-dimensional bigotry.
And who are and have always been the majority of Marxists and Socialist party members and thinkers?
Oh, that's right..MEN!! Not just MEN, but white European men.
Seriously. This is all you got?
Last edited: