China’s culpability in the creation, leak and spread of CV19 - proof as far back as 2018

[Philomath]

Please read this article from a former Navy Intelligence officer. It is very sound logic and a thorough investigation.

China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018

A world inquiring about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 has been met with repeated antipathy and lack of cooperation on the part of the Chinese Communist Party. Consequently, any speculation that the CCP concealed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 prior to December 2019 must be researched through an...

theethicalskeptic.com

 

[Jam]

The Earlier Lab Leak Hypothesis

The Chloroquine Wars Part LXXXI

roundingtheearth.substack.com

 

[amd]

Be advised of the constant push/propaganda to blame Russia or China for just about everything these days.

The Chinese Communist Party owes the entire world restitution for its negligent handling and release of a virus which they fully understood could be deployed as a weapon of war.

Strong words indeed. Lets see.

Are we supposed to direct our attention away from Anthony Fauci and the NIH, or even Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, to focus on Wuhan?

You could follow the money instead.

The NIH funded gain-of-function research (BSL-2) at the Wuhan Institute of Virolgy via the EcoHealth Alliance.

Just like the WHO and the CDC changed the definition of what a pandemic and a vaccine are, NIH changed the definition of gain-of-function research.


NIH Officials Worked With EcoHealth Alliance to Evade Restrictions on Coronavirus Experiments
https://theintercept.com/2021/11/03/coronavirus-research-ecohealth-nih-emails/

Emails show that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.

In a 2016 progress report, the group described to NIH its plans to carry out two planned experiments infecting humanized mice with hybrid viruses, known as “chimeras.”

Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause.

But what happened next sets off alarm bells for biosafety advocates: Agency staff adopted language that EcoHealth Alliance crafted to govern its own work. The agency inserted several sentences into grant materials describing immediate actions the group would take if the viruses they created proved to become more transmissible or disease-causing as the result of the experiments.


Senator Paul Accuses Dr. Fauci of Changing Gain of Function Research Definition on NIH Website
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4985061/senator-paul-accuses-dr-fauci-changing-gain-function-research-definition-nih-website

At a Senate hearing on the Biden administration's COVID-19 pandemic response, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of changing the definition of gain of function research and that he should resign.


NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan, Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements
https://news.yahoo.com/nih-admits-funding-gain-function-125103852.html

In the letter to Representative James Comer (R., Ky.), Lawrence A. Tabak of the NIH cites a “limited experiment” that was conducted to test if “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.” The laboratory mice infected with the modified bat virus “became sicker” than those infected with the unmodified bat virus.


Inside the Risky Bat-Virus Engineering that Links America to Wuhan
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/1027290/gain-of-function-risky-bat-virus-engineering-links-america-to-wuhan/

MIT Technology Review - June 29, 2021

In 2013, the American virologist Ralph Baric approached Zhengli Shi at a meeting. Baric was a top expert in coronaviruses, with hundreds of papers to his credit, and Shi, along with her team at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, had been discovering them by the fistful in bat caves. In one sample of bat guano, Shi had detected the genome of a new virus, called SHC014, that was one of the two closest relatives to the original SARS virus, but her team had not been able to culture it in the lab.

Baric had developed a way around that problem—a technique for “reverse genetics” in coronaviruses. Not only did it allow him to bring an actual virus to life from its genetic code, but he could mix and match parts of multiple viruses. He wanted to take the “spike” gene from SHC014 and move it into a genetic copy of the SARS virus he already had in his lab. The spike molecule is what lets a coronavirus open a cell and get inside it. The resulting chimera would demonstrate whether the spike of SHC014 would attach to human cells.

Baric asked Shi if he could have the genetic data for SHC014. “She was gracious enough to send us those sequences almost immediately,” he says. His team introduced the virus modified with that code into mice and into a petri dish of human airway cells. Sure enough, the chimera exhibited “robust replication” in the human cells—evidence that nature was full of coronaviruses ready to leap directly to people.

While Baric’s study was in progress, the National Institutes of Health announced that it would temporarily halt funding for “gain of function” research—experiments that make already dangerous viruses more virulent or transmissible—on SARS, MERS (which is also caused by a coronavirus), and influenza until the safety of such research could be assessed. The announcement brought Baric’s work to a standstill.

The NIH decided the risk was worth it. In a potentially fateful decision, it funded work similar to Baric’s at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras.

Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+.

What caused the covid-19 pandemic remains uncertain, and Shi says her lab never encountered the SARS-CoV-2 virus before the Wuhan outbreak. But now that US officials have said the possibility of a lab accident needs to be investigated, the spotlight has fallen on American funding of the Wuhan lab’s less safe research.

The simmering concern that the US funded risky research in China burst into the national discussion on May 11, when Senator Rand Paul accused Anthony Fauci, the longtime director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of funding “supervirus” research in the US and “making a huge mistake” by trading the know-how to China. Paul repeatedly confronted Fauci and demanded to know if he had funded gain-of-function research in that country. Fauci denied the accusation, stating categorically: “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

The denial rests on the NIH’s specific definition of what was covered by the moratorium: work that would have deliberately enhanced SARS-like viruses, MERS, or flu by—for example—making them easier to spread through the air.

The NIH has still not fully explained its decision-making and did not reply to questions. Citing a pending investigation, it has declined to release copies of the grant that sent the Wuhan institute about $600,000 between 2014 and 2019. It has also revealed little about its new system for assessing gain-of-function risks, which is carried out by an anonymous review panel whose deliberations are not made public. Until there’s more sunlight, the agency will be fighting speculation, from Paul and others, that what occurred is a scenario Fauci himself had outlined in a 2012 commentary discussing research on pandemic germs.


Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484390/

Anthony S. Fauci - Oct 9, 2012

Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

 

[amd]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzHAvw1WGkU

 

[amd]

The REAL Anthony Fauci with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-real-anthony-fauci-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr.43853/

 

[Jon2547]

Could it possibly be that this is just a cover story?

In other words, a fake conspiracy?

As far as I know, the virus has never been isolated.

 

[amd]

Don't forget to read the post above on (the REAL) Anthony Fauci, it is pertinent to the discussion.

The current inflation is a by-product of scarcity brought upon by governments trying to crash the economy (lockdowns) to bring the Great Reset (elimination of debt) because they are bankrupt and have pillage/mismanaged (directly and indirectly) the pension funds.

The media replaces the word "government" with "pandemic".

 

[ddjd]

Be advised of the constant push/propaganda to blame Russia or China for just about everything these days.



Strong words indeed. Lets see.

Are we supposed to direct our attention away from Anthony Fauci and the NIH, or even Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, to focus on Wuhan?

You could follow the money instead.

The NIH funded gain-of-function research (BSL-2) at the Wuhan Institute of Virolgy via the EcoHealth Alliance.

Just like the WHO and the CDC changed the definition of what a pandemic and a vaccine are, NIH changed the definition of gain-of-function research.


NIH Officials Worked With EcoHealth Alliance to Evade Restrictions on Coronavirus Experiments
https://theintercept.com/2021/11/03/coronavirus-research-ecohealth-nih-emails/

Emails show that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.

In a 2016 progress report, the group described to NIH its plans to carry out two planned experiments infecting humanized mice with hybrid viruses, known as “chimeras.”

Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause.

But what happened next sets off alarm bells for biosafety advocates: Agency staff adopted language that EcoHealth Alliance crafted to govern its own work. The agency inserted several sentences into grant materials describing immediate actions the group would take if the viruses they created proved to become more transmissible or disease-causing as the result of the experiments.


Senator Paul Accuses Dr. Fauci of Changing Gain of Function Research Definition on NIH Website
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4985061/senator-paul-accuses-dr-fauci-changing-gain-function-research-definition-nih-website

At a Senate hearing on the Biden administration's COVID-19 pandemic response, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of changing the definition of gain of function research and that he should resign.


NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan, Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements
https://news.yahoo.com/nih-admits-funding-gain-function-125103852.html

In the letter to Representative James Comer (R., Ky.), Lawrence A. Tabak of the NIH cites a “limited experiment” that was conducted to test if “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.” The laboratory mice infected with the modified bat virus “became sicker” than those infected with the unmodified bat virus.


Inside the Risky Bat-Virus Engineering that Links America to Wuhan
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/1027290/gain-of-function-risky-bat-virus-engineering-links-america-to-wuhan/

MIT Technology Review - June 29, 2021

In 2013, the American virologist Ralph Baric approached Zhengli Shi at a meeting. Baric was a top expert in coronaviruses, with hundreds of papers to his credit, and Shi, along with her team at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, had been discovering them by the fistful in bat caves. In one sample of bat guano, Shi had detected the genome of a new virus, called SHC014, that was one of the two closest relatives to the original SARS virus, but her team had not been able to culture it in the lab.

Baric had developed a way around that problem—a technique for “reverse genetics” in coronaviruses. Not only did it allow him to bring an actual virus to life from its genetic code, but he could mix and match parts of multiple viruses. He wanted to take the “spike” gene from SHC014 and move it into a genetic copy of the SARS virus he already had in his lab. The spike molecule is what lets a coronavirus open a cell and get inside it. The resulting chimera would demonstrate whether the spike of SHC014 would attach to human cells.

Baric asked Shi if he could have the genetic data for SHC014. “She was gracious enough to send us those sequences almost immediately,” he says. His team introduced the virus modified with that code into mice and into a petri dish of human airway cells. Sure enough, the chimera exhibited “robust replication” in the human cells—evidence that nature was full of coronaviruses ready to leap directly to people.

While Baric’s study was in progress, the National Institutes of Health announced that it would temporarily halt funding for “gain of function” research—experiments that make already dangerous viruses more virulent or transmissible—on SARS, MERS (which is also caused by a coronavirus), and influenza until the safety of such research could be assessed. The announcement brought Baric’s work to a standstill.

The NIH decided the risk was worth it. In a potentially fateful decision, it funded work similar to Baric’s at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras.

Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+.

What caused the covid-19 pandemic remains uncertain, and Shi says her lab never encountered the SARS-CoV-2 virus before the Wuhan outbreak. But now that US officials have said the possibility of a lab accident needs to be investigated, the spotlight has fallen on American funding of the Wuhan lab’s less safe research.

The simmering concern that the US funded risky research in China burst into the national discussion on May 11, when Senator Rand Paul accused Anthony Fauci, the longtime director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of funding “supervirus” research in the US and “making a huge mistake” by trading the know-how to China. Paul repeatedly confronted Fauci and demanded to know if he had funded gain-of-function research in that country. Fauci denied the accusation, stating categorically: “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

The denial rests on the NIH’s specific definition of what was covered by the moratorium: work that would have deliberately enhanced SARS-like viruses, MERS, or flu by—for example—making them easier to spread through the air.

The NIH has still not fully explained its decision-making and did not reply to questions. Citing a pending investigation, it has declined to release copies of the grant that sent the Wuhan institute about $600,000 between 2014 and 2019. It has also revealed little about its new system for assessing gain-of-function risks, which is carried out by an anonymous review panel whose deliberations are not made public. Until there’s more sunlight, the agency will be fighting speculation, from Paul and others, that what occurred is a scenario Fauci himself had outlined in a 2012 commentary discussing research on pandemic germs.


Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484390/

Anthony S. Fauci - Oct 9, 2012

Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

View: https://rumble.com/vsx7b0-the-american-journal-peter-daszak-was-working-for-the-cia.html

 

[lvysaur]

IMO there are only two possibilities:
1) China is completely innocent
2) China is simply complicit with the US gov

There is no possibility that China is solely at fault for this. The viral DNA matches the moderna patent from 2016, not to mention many other creepy coincidences.

View: https://imgur.com/a/CRwan3n