GreenEyedBlonde
Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2016
- Messages
- 161
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Those that really don't want to catch the virus, to the point where they are doing some actual research, will be wearing N95s or P100s. I see very few out and about in an N95 let alone a P100.I'm more interested in what science says than what "experts" say. Many experts have simply risen to their level of incompetence (Peter Principle). There are a dozen or so randomized controlled trials (RCT) - the gold standard of science - that concluded surgical masks do not significantly prevent transmission of influenza virus. The CDC published an article about that in May 2020 (I think that's the right month). A recent Danish RCT concluded the same for sarscov2. There are no RCTs that indicate masks work. So any "expert" that contradicts the best science is not an expert in science.
My question was an honest one, not a smug disavowal of people like you. Depending on where you are, most people wear masks. Is it because they actually fear the virus, or because they fear not conforming to the crowd?
You are not wrong and that would be a step in the right direction. This mask thread is falling short in that it's only discussing masks alone. Fauci took enormous criticism on July 31st last year when he told the press that the virus has 3 mucosal entry points into the body. The eyes nose and mouth. He inferred better protection would be attained by blocking the eyes as well with goggles but he reasoned the public would never go for that.Those that really don't want to catch the virus, to the point where they are doing some actual research, will be wearing N95s or P100s. I see very few out and about in an N95 let alone a P100.
You are not wrong and that would be a step in the right direction. This mask thread is falling short in that it's only discussing masks alone. Fauci took enormous criticism on July 31st last year when he told the press that the virus has 3 mucosal entry points into the body. The eyes nose and mouth. He inferred better protection would be attained by blocking the eyes as well with goggles but he reasoned the public would never go for that.
I cannot disagree with you since virus particles are submicroscopic and because they are so tiny may find a way to enter regardless. Perhaps there is very little effect we can have, though our wish to protect others is our sincere desire.Even that is silly. The only true protection would be full isolation in a sterile bubble, like David Vetter had to live in for 12 years, and/or a Hazmat suit. And there would have to be an intense sterilization protocol for anything that was passed into your bubble or suit, like being heated above 200 degrees Fahrenheit for a half hour, or use of chemicals like ethylene oxide.
Simply wearing a mask, gloves and goggles will do little, if anything. As soon as you venture out of your bubble, even within your own house, you will be exposed to all sorts of things with this potential "virus" on it. And using all of those things and then going to the store or getting things delivered via the mail or UPS or whatever...... yeah, no real protection. Not that any of that is necessary in the slightest.
Gotta love the Simpsons---look how long that show has endured because it's awesome. If they haven't already , probably a very funny new pandemic episode on the way. Some do say the Simpsons predicted all this in 1993 (probably just creatively pieced together by somebody from multiple episodes)."The virus decided to jump in you first because you forgot to wear your mask, dummy!" *cue Nelson from The Simpsons laugh*
As if this should even be a competition or race here on who "outlasts Corona" or something, positing avoidance parameters or circumstances beyond most would even figure as some sort of hidden Litmus test of superiority.
He is just trying to be peaty.
Yeah, I guess you can call it ‘box’ breathing lolHe is just trying to be peaty.
2 masks will hold more co2 .
It is an alternative to ray peat bag breathing