inurendotoxin
Member
I think attraction to people is not because of who they are but rather because of the resources they have access to, even though we might not realize it consciously. We don't have innate personalities. We are nothing but reflections of the environment we have lived in.
If someone unluckily grew up on PUFA, then he/she is screwed in so many aspects through no fault of his/her own relative to someone who grew up on butter.
PUFA can be methylated. Optimal metabolism is the cycle of renew and replace...we are not the same today as we were yesterday.
So what's the point? No one is inherently better than or worse than anyone else, we are all the same blank canvas, just painted different colors by the environment, so no one is ever actually worthy of respect or admiration and similarly no one is worthy of disrespect, because they themselves are not responsible for their good/bad qualities, the environment they grew up in is.
"The point" is to tune into your internal guidance system, and follow where it leads. In cleched / bastardised terms, find the thing you love doing, and tweak everything else to make time for that.
Fixing the hormonal pathways can help with that. Also improving your environment & routine, or replacing it with a completely new one.
On the flip side, if we're a product of our environments, diets and the relationships we have (you missed this one), then we can enact positive long-term changes on ourselves. You don't have to deep fry everything in soybean oil; you don't have to work
That's much more empowering than attributing everything to 'genetics' which is akin to consigning everything to fate.
The misanthropy in your second paragraph is recognisable to me, I find my perspective shifts in that direction from time to time. It's always correlated with periods of social isolation or 'unsatisfying' social interaction. It might help you if you spend some good quality time with old friends or family.
I second the second poster here (hee hee).
Surely attraction is at least some combination of genetics and environment? Even through a bioenergetic lens.
If we assume the evolutionary purpose of attraction is procreation (stop me if we are not assuming this), then selecting for healthy genes to match with takes at least equal precedence to me as "does this person have access to good resources"?
I don't think you can "logic" yourself out of sexual attraction. Hormonal imbalance can do that, but that is correctable, as we know....