Magnesium Malate any good?
Not bad, if it does not irritate the stomach as malate salts tend to do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Magnesium Malate any good?
Vitamin K2 is useless under the doses of vitamin D we have employed
I have been applying 1 to 3 drops to my temples/forehead daily in the morning for about a week.
Results are no daytime sleepiness at all. No crashes after food. No fading out in the afternoon at office.
This is a major improvement and something that has never happened with my previous oral vitamin D supplementation attempts.
So, big thank you to haidut!!
Useless within the range that they employ. I suspect that only mk-7 was used (not sure!), and perhaps it would change the whole story if mk-4 was used instead. It's up to the patient to use it or not.So, what does that mean? Useless without vitamin D or useless below the doses of vitamin D used.
but also removal from bones to the point of risking net loss
Zeus, I'm not sure if he ever explained in detail why exactly, if I come across I'll let you know. But from his brief mentions, I think it's because the vit D resistance that some people experience is not generalized, the doses needed in enough amounts for a therapeutic effect can surpass those that are related to calcium regulation, so the effect on calcium deposition from those doses is so strong that the person is at risk of constantly responding to the lowered calcium with its removal from bones.What is the proposed mechanism for vitamin D removing calcium from bones?? AFAIK, vitamin D is one of the few agents known to increase osteocalcin synthesis, which lowers bone resoprtion/turnover and increases osteoblast formation. So, it should have bone building effects regardless of the dose, especially when combined with vitamin K (which also raises osteocalcin).
Zeus, I'm not sure if he ever explained in detail why exactly, if I come across I'll let you know. But from his brief mentions, I think it's because the vit D resistance that some people experience is not generalized, the doses needed in enough amounts for a therapeutic effect can surpass those that are related to calcium regulation, so the effect on calcium deposition from those doses is so strong that the person is at risk of constantly responding to the lowered calcium with its removal from bones.
No, I mean, if anything, to keep blood levels in range and stable.Thanks, if you do find his explanation please send. I don't know of a mechanism by which vitamin D will increase calcium deposition so much that it would lead to leeching from the bones to deposit...again in the bones.
This has probably been asked before, but is there an upper limit to SFA esters?
I have been applying 1 to 3 drops to my temples/forehead daily in the morning for about a week.
Results are no daytime sleepiness at all. No crashes after food. No fading out in the afternoon at office.
This is a major improvement and something that has never happened with my previous oral vitamin D supplementation attempts.
So, big thank you to haidut!!
I moved application to wrists because the ethanol was trying out temple area and eyelids but noticed fading out returned so went back to forehead and careful to keep application a bit higher up and benefit returned.
but his was not ethanol basedI put vitamin D on my wrists for months and noticed no change in blood levels. In an email discussion I had with Peat he mentioned that the wrists was not a good place to put vitamin D, that it was too small of an area, and suggested legs.
but his was not ethanol based
True, maybe that is a factor, but he didn't mention any differences in oil, or ethanol to me, simply "vitamin D" I am simply relaying what he said.
"I think a large surface is needed, tops of feet, calves, and arms, for example, for vitamin D. Vitamin A needs less area."
I think shoulders and neck are also good areas. Temples are also great, as @GAF found out by himself. The temple area probably benefits the brain more than anything else but still it is a good place to try.
Temples are a smaller surface area than say, forearms, no?
I think shoulders and neck are also good areas. Temples are also great, as @GAF found out by himself. The temple area probably benefits the brain more than anything else but still it is a good place to try.
I usually think about how a supplement might get rubbed off. Unless I am topless I would think shoulders would get rubbed into clothing straight away. I usually put vitamins on my feet, rubbing them together, then wrapping them in plastic wrap under my socks. I have no idea if this saves any vitamins or not but it makes sense to me.