Bombshell Study — Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA…

[Braveheart]

Bombshell Study — Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA…​

Pfizer Vaxx Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA… ‘Permanent chromosomal change’…

Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study CLINICAL STUDY The messenger RNA (mRNA) from Pfizer’s COVID vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and i…

citizenfreepress.com

 

[tankasnowgod]

Bombshell Study — Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA…​

Pfizer Vaxx Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA… ‘Permanent chromosomal change’…

Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study CLINICAL STUDY The messenger RNA (mRNA) from Pfizer’s COVID vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and i…

citizenfreepress.com

I think it's important to keep in mind this was only an in vitro study. While it did show this was an absolute possibility, it does not prove that this would happen in vivo in anyone who took the injection, nor suggest if it would have any noticeable effects.

However, it does indeed show the CDC (and any other entities) were lying (either through ignorance, or pure deception) when they claimed this can "never" happen. It also shows that those who were concerned with this possibility were absolutely justified in that concern.

It certainly shows the wisdom in the idea of waiting to take any new drug that is introduced to the public, especially Peat's rule of waiting at least 20 years.

 

[Donttreadonme]

Well the FDA released information today from a FOI request on the adverse reactions to the "vaccines" and turns out the vaccines were not so harmless as the people were told.

Obviously if people are injected with something that causes their bodies cells to produce spike proteins that their bodies think is a pathogen, how can that be harmless? The "vaccines" literally cause your cells to produce a protein that is foreign to the human body... And people think that is a good idea that is harmless?

The media is of course ignoring the latest news on the DNA being reprogrammed.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Obviously if people are injected with something that causes their bodies cells to produce spike proteins that their bodies think is a pathogen,

This part isn't obvious. At all. These are the most rushed to market drugs in history, for a virus that has never been proven to exist, and neither has this alleged "Spike Protein."

All that's "obvious" is that these injections cause serious side effects, some potentially lethal. But all sorts of substances can be potentially lethal when injected, including regular vaccines, drugs like Sodium Pentothal, and even "saline" solutions, that have been contaminated with other substances (like mold, or other contaminants from unsterile procedures).

If you look at the ingredients of the injections, there are several that could cause some or all of the side effects, like the custom lipids with ridiculously long names, and polyethelyene glycol.

how can that be harmless? The "vaccines" literally cause your cells to produce a protein that is foreign to the human body...

Well, that is the "official" mechanism of action proclaimed by the drug companies, and it itself is alarming. But just like the trials didn't show any reduction in death or serious cases, and the potential fraud issues in the Pfizer trial even call into question the idea of "Relative Risk Reduction" of being diagnosed with Covid, none of the trials (nor any other evidence) prove that these mRNA injections causes human cells to produce any foreign protein.

 

[Donttreadonme]

This part isn't obvious. At all. These are the most rushed to market drugs in history, for a virus that has never been proven to exist, and neither has this alleged "Spike Protein."

All that's "obvious" is that these injections cause serious side effects, some potentially lethal. But all sorts of substances can be potentially lethal when injected, including regular vaccines, drugs like Sodium Pentothal, and even "saline" solutions, that have been contaminated with other substances (like mold, or other contaminants from unsterile procedures).

If you look at the ingredients of the injections, there are several that could cause some or all of the side effects, like the custom lipids with ridiculously long names, and polyethelyene glycol.

Well, that is the "official" mechanism of action proclaimed by the drug companies, and it itself is alarming. But just like the trials didn't show any reduction in death or serious cases, and the potential fraud issues in the Pfizer trial even call into question the idea of "Relative Risk Reduction" of being diagnosed with Covid, none of the trials (nor any other evidence) prove that these mRNA injections causes human cells to produce any foreign protein.

The spike protein is unique to SARS-CoV-2 – it doesn't look like other proteins your body makes.

 

[tankasnowgod]

The spike protein is unique to SARS-CoV-2 – it doesn't look like other proteins your body makes.

I know the mythology of this alleged "Spike Protein." But, where is the proof that it even exists in the first place?

And, where is the proof that any of these so called "vaccines" cause human cells to make it?

So far, I have only seen a handful of studies that claim to measure "Spike Protein" after injection of one of these psuedo vaccines, and in total, they measured levels in less than 40 subjects. That is far from proof. Even if it is detecting alien proteins, it still doesn't mean that it was human cells that made them, as they could have entered the body through the normal ways a contagion could.

If you read the "Materials and Methods" section of any study that claims to have "isolated" SARS-Cov-2 in the first place, it becomes abundantly clear they didn't "isolate" anything, at least using the normal English definition of the word.

Isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first US COVID-19 patient

The etiologic agent of the outbreak of pneumonia in Wuhan China was identified as severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in January, 2020. The first US patient was diagnosed by the State of Washington and the US Centers ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Cell culture, limiting dilution, and isolation​

Vero CCL-81 cells were used for isolation and initial passage. Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat inactivated fetal bovine serum(5 or 10%) and antibiotic/antimyotic (GIBCO). Both NP an OP swabs were used for virus isolation. For the isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, 50 μl serum free DMEM was pipetted into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate. One-hundred μl clinical specimens were pipetted into column 1, and then serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. Vero cells were trypsinized and resuspended in DMEM + 10% FBS + 2X Penicillin-Streptomycin + 2X antibiotic − antimycotic + 2 X amphotericin B at 2.5 × 105 cells / ml. One hundred μl of cell suspension were added directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. The inoculated cultures were grown in a humidified 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effect (CPE) daily. Standard plaque assays were used for SARS-CoV-2 based on both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV protocols (19, 20).

So, since they didn't really "isolate" or purify this virus, how can any claims about a building block of this virus be believed, either?