BMJ investigation on pfizers clinical trial fraud

Rasaari

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
208
A bmj investigation on pfizers vaccine trials being full of "data integrity" issues.
www.bmj.com

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...
www.bmj.com
"A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails."

"However, at Ventavia, Jackson told The BMJ that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel. As a corrective action taken in September, two months into trial recruitment and with around 1000 participants already enrolled, quality assurance checklists were updated with instructions for staff to remove drug assignments from charts."

"Ventavia was not keeping up with data entry queries, shows an email sent by ICON, the contract research organisation with which Pfizer partnered on the trial. ICON reminded Ventavia in a September 2020 email: “The expectation for this study is that all queries are addressed within 24hrs.” ICON then highlighted over 100 outstanding queries older than three days in yellow. Examples included two individuals for which “Subject has reported with Severe symptoms/reactions … Per protocol, subjects experiencing Grade 3 local reactions should be contacted. Please confirm if an UNPLANNED CONTACT was made and update the corresponding form as appropriate.” According to the trial protocol a telephone contact should have occurred “to ascertain further details and determine whether a site visit is clinically indicated.”

Concerns raised​

In her 25 September email to the FDA Jackson wrote that Ventavia had enrolled more than 1000 participants at three sites. The full trial (registered under NCT04368728) enrolled around 44 000 participants across 153 sites that included numerous commercial companies and academic centres. She then listed a dozen concerns she had witnessed, including:

  • Participants placed in a hallway after injection and not being monitored by clinical staff
  • Lack of timely follow-up of patients who experienced adverse events
  • Protocol deviations not being reported
  • Vaccines not being stored at proper temperatures
  • Mislabelled laboratory specimens, and
  • Targeting of Ventavia staff for reporting these types of problems.
"After Jackson left the company problems persisted at Ventavia, this employee said. In several cases Ventavia lacked enough employees to swab all trial participants who reported covid-like symptoms, to test for infection. Laboratory confirmed symptomatic covid-19 was the trial’s primary endpoint, the employee noted. (An FDA review memorandum released in August this year states that across the full trial swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected cases of symptomatic covid-19.)"


"Since Jackson reported problems with Ventavia to the FDA in September 2020, Pfizer has hired Ventavia as a research subcontractor on four other vaccine clinical trials (covid-19 vaccine in children and young adults, pregnant women, and a booster dose, as well an RSV vaccine trial"
 

cats

Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Messages
117
That last paragraph. They hired them back because they are doing exactly what they want them to do.
 
OP
Rasaari

Rasaari

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
208
That last paragraph. They hired them back because they are doing exactly what they want them to do.
As soon as she whistleblowed to FDA she got mysteriosly fired. A dog won't bite the hand that feeds...The fda also failed to conduct a inspection on the sight after getting this information.
 
Last edited:

cats

Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Messages
117
As soon as she whistleblowed to FDA she got mysteriosly fired. A dog won't bite the hand that feeds...The fda also failed to conduct a inspection on the sight after getting this information.
Yup. And they apparently had no fear of how guilty they'd look for firing her immediately after she reported them. It's as if they knew they were protected.
 

cats

Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Messages
117
Think about it: if these contractors have no regard for the accuracy of their methods, it's not much of an ethical leap for them to start adjusting data to suit their employer's preferences. All it would take is someone at the pharma company to drop a subtle hint to each of the many contractors running their clinical trials and they'll move the needle enough to get the study outcome they want - with full deniability if anything ever leaks. The contractors want to be considered for future contracts, so they'll oblige.
 

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
This is a worthwhile video for anyone who wants to be informed about the data obfuscation by Pfizer possibly mirroring a general trend.

 
Last edited:
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom