tankasnowgod
Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,131
For one, I never said anything about mandates. I think everybody should wear a (non-n95) mask because its the right thing to do. That said, my county does require it and does have fines for not complying. I don't have a problem with that given that I am wearing one anyway. Further, stores and other establishments are absolutely empowered to refuse service on any criteria at all, except for race, gender, sexual orientation, age . . . .
As for proving the things you say, studying these things in a controlled environment is not a bad idea. Expecting it to be done before anybody adopts what is otherwise a simple and easy and prima facie harmless. Surgical masks have been worn for centuries in various contexts without a hint of trouble. I generally respect the reason and support you bring to an argument, but this one really is a wild strawman. I mean, perhaps we should seek proof that baseball caps don't cause brain cancer before we consider wearing one?
It's funny that you think everyone should wear a non-95 mask, as that's the only mask that has a chance of stopping a virus. Are you suggesting that the "right" thing to do is spread the virus while giving everyone else a false sense of security that you aren't? What's the possible logic here?
Well, if you're not talking about mandates, then you are trying to change my opinion. The only way you are going to do that is with facts.
As far as Surgical masks being worn "without a hint of trouble...." you are just flat out wrong. I posted this study to the forum years ago-
http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n2/3.pdf
It's just one that looks at the health induced changes of wearing a mask. Do an experiment today, put on a mask and wear it for two hours. Notice if you see any changes in yourself, your level of thinking, your level of lung strain. Notice if you experience a sense of relief after taking it off. Do an experiment when you wear it out in the sun. See if you start to feel too hot.