Rambo
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2019
- Messages
- 3
I haven't had the chance to do a deep dive into the article, but I wanted to get the conversation started. I'm hoping some of the more seasoned scientists (lay or otherwise) can point out the flaws in this study and why this association is not necessarily causal. My initial thought is that you can't just start choking down the sugared coffee, orange juice, and Mexican coke without also minimizing PUFA. So, in other words, a high PUFA/high sugar diet is worse than a high PUFA/low sugar diet. But, the Ray Peat argument is a low PUFA/high sugar diet is optimal... correct?
Would you agree that an increase in sugar consumption without changing other diet parameters is a step in the wrong direction and is associated with mortality risk? Or do you believe that an increase in sugar consumption has nothing to do with the mortality risk?
Association of Sugary Beverage Consumption With Mortality Risk in US Adults
Would you agree that an increase in sugar consumption without changing other diet parameters is a step in the wrong direction and is associated with mortality risk? Or do you believe that an increase in sugar consumption has nothing to do with the mortality risk?
Association of Sugary Beverage Consumption With Mortality Risk in US Adults