Article - Did Chinese scientists find autism’s missing puzzle piece?

[ALS]

Just posting this for reference - Did Chinese scientists find autism’s missing puzzle piece?

"
BY J.B. HANDLEY February 22, 2017

Scientists appear to be far closer to explaining the mechanisms of action within the body that cause autism. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in Canada, France, Israel, and China. Four clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered are forming an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.

 

[burtlancast]

Just posting this for reference - Did Chinese scientists find autism’s missing puzzle piece?

"
BY J.B. HANDLEY February 22, 2017

Scientists appear to be far closer to explaining the mechanisms of action within the body that cause autism. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in Canada, France, Israel, and China. Four clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered are forming an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.

From your referenced article:

I’m indebted to an anonymous scientist who runs a website called Vaccine Papers, where many of these insights came from.

Now, that's a cracking site:

VaccinePapers.org - An objective look at vaccine dangers.

Immune activation during early development causes autism and other disorders. Vaccines can cause damaging immune activation. Aluminum adjuvant is implicated

vaccinepapers.org

About​

Share
In recent years, powerful scientific evidence has emerged indicating that vaccines cause brain damage such as autism, epilepsy, schizophrenia, depression, attention-deficit disorder and other mental illnesses. This scientific evidence has been largely ignored by the media, and by medical institutions that are supposedly guided by science.

Vaccinepapers.org provides detailed, science-based and objective information about the dangers of vaccines. We are most concerned about aluminum adjuvant toxicity and immune activation-mediated brain damage. Vaccinepapers.org is the first to make this hugely important scientific research accessible to the public.

Aluminum Adjuvant Toxicity
It is now known that aluminum adjuvants are not safely eliminated from the body, as assumed by vaccine advocates. Rather, they are taken up by immune system cells (macrophages) and transported around the body, including into the brain. Aluminum adjuvant can cause brain damage and autoimmune diseases.

Immune Activation Brain DamageThe dangers of Aluminum in Vaccines
Human brain development is controlled by immune-system signals (i.e. “cytokines”). Activation of the immune system during brain development causes disruptions in these signals, resulting in permanent brain damage, including autism. Adverse vaccine reactions are proven to stimulate a cytokine (interleukin-6) proven to cause autism. There is a large amount of research on this, by many laboratories around the world, but it is being ignored.

Aluminum and immune activation
Aluminum and immune activation are connected, because aluminum triggers immune activation, and interleukin-6 specifically. Aluminum also stimulates Th2 activation, a type of immune activation shown to cause brain damage in animal studies (interleukin-6 is a component of Th2 activation). So the issues of aluminum and immune activation are connected.

Our perspective:
Like any other medical treatment, vaccination must be justified in view of an objective risk/benefit analysis. All risks and benefits must be considered. Any rational medical treatment must do more good than harm. This is universally accepted.
The problem with vaccines is that risks have been underestimated, and the benefits overestimated. In particular, the risk of brain damage from vaccines is much higher than commonly believed. Brain damage can be devastating to the life of a child, and the child’s family. The personal and financial costs of vaccine injury are often enormous. Therefore, even a small risk of brain damage must be considered seriously. And the science strongly suggests that the risk is not small.

Vaccinepapers.org is not ideologically opposed to all vaccines, but we are unaware of any specific vaccine that has an acceptable level of proven safety, especially for infants, and especially if it contains aluminum adjuvant. However, some vaccines may be worth the risk for some people in some environments (e.g. a yellow fever vaccine for traveling in equatorial Africa). The risk of a vaccine depends greatly on the adjuvant (type and amount), the type and magnitude of immune activation it stimulates, the presence of other substances (e.g. antigens with allergenic potential), and the susceptibilities and health history of the recipient. There is not nearly enough science available to accurately estimate these contributors to risk.
However, we do not make recommendations regarding specific vaccines. We urge careful consideration of the risk of serious and permanent harm, including disabling brain damage, long-term immune disorders and death. Determining which vaccines are worth the risk is a decision left to the reader.

Us and Them
We denounce the personal attacks, insults and harassment pursued by some in the vaccine debate (on both sides). We do not do this. We ask critics of Vaccinepapers to be respectful and not engage in this behavior.
We assume that both sides in this debate share the same goal: a medical system that maximizes the health of children and all people. We do not demonize people of the opposition as monsters intending to harm (however, our opinion of pharmaceutical companies is not so charitable).
The vaccine debate has been in the gutter for far too long. There are important issues raised by recent scientific findings that deserve consideration. Society will benefit the most from a rational, polite debate about them. We seek to positively contribute to this debate.

---

FAQs​

Why should I not trust the advice given by the majority of health care professionals in the world when it comes to something as important as preventing highly contagious and possibly deadly diseases?

Two reasons:
1) Because medical science is the most corrupt of the sciences. It is extremely corrupt. Big pharma companies pay to have fake scientific papers written and published. Big pharma funds the medical science journals with advertising and reprint fees. Big pharma influences research and curriculum at medical schools. Big pharma pays for speaking fees and accommodations at medical-scientific conferences. Big pharma funds most medical research. So, the people selling the treatments are the ones that have the most influence over the direction of medicine: what ideas are acceptable and supported, and what ideas are neglected and discarded. And anything that doesn’t make them money (i.e. that’s non-patentable) is neglected, or denounced.

2) Medicine has a blind spot when it comes to iatrogenic (doctor-caused) diseases and damage. It’s psychologically distressing for doctors to deal with the reality that they sometimes do great harm to people with their treatments. Doctors find it very unpleasant to be confronted with evidence they are harming and killing people. Cognitive dissonance causes profound perceptual and cognitive biases. Blaming vaccines for autism and brain damage is the same thing as blaming the doctors, so of course they protest and deny the evidence. Combine corruption with the biases, and the result is a medical establishment that makes incredibly bad decisions and harms millions of people.
An example of the hostility doctors display in response to discoveries of doctor-caused diseases is the story of Dr. Semmelweis. In the 1840s, he discovered that doctors were causing deadly infections in women by delivering babies with dirty hands. Doctors would go back and forth between the morgue and the delivery room without washing. Semmelweis proved that it was the unclean doctors causing the deaths, which they did not appreciate. Semmelweis’s discovery blamed his colleagues for killing people. Instead of being praised and rewarded for his important discovery, Semmelweis was ridiculed, viciously attacked and hounded out of medicine. And all Semmelweis was trying to do was convince other doctors to wash their hands! It took about 20 years until Semmelweis’s recommendations were in widespread use.

---

Are you saying that doctors and medical professionals don’t look at the science? If so, why?
Correct. They don’t. Doctors and public health people spend little time reading the literature for themselves. They foolishly trust the CDC and industry-funded trade groups to interpret the science and make recommendations for them, which they follow. The vaccine industry writes the vaccine recommendations. Doctors and most medical professionals are not independent thinkers. They don’t have the time or interest. Most simply follow the conventional recommendations and don’t question them. But what if the conventional recommendations are wrong? Medical consensus has been wrong many times in the past.

---

Why should I trust you? You guys are just doing this for the money!
Vaccinepapers.org makes no money, and never will. Vaccinepapers.org is strictly non-commercial. We have no advertising. We do not sell or recommend any products. We do not have affiliate agreements or any commercial relationship with any business or website. We do not link to any commercial websites (we only link to a few scientific journals). We do not receive any financial or other support from any anti-vaccine organizations, or anyone.
The vaccinepapers.org project is motivated purely by concern about widespread health damage from the overuse of vaccines. The media and medical establishment are blatantly lying about what science is discovering about the dangers of vaccines. Our goal is to explain the science and make it accessible, so people can see for themselves how the media, pharmaceutical industry and medical establishment are deceiving the public.

---

Why don’t you publish a peer-reviewed paper on your theory that vaccines cause autism via immune activation?
Because it would be ignored. As the content here demonstrates, there are lots of important scientific papers that disappear in the science journals. Whats needed today is an explanation of the science for intelligent non-specialists, showing how the scientific results fit together to tell a story. We reach a much larger audience this way. Also, a blog allows instant updating as the science progresses. And a blog can include a diversity of topics and connect them in ways impossible to do in a scientific paper.

---

Who are you guys? Why don’t you say who you are? How can we trust you if we don’t know who you are?
Because it really doesn’t matter, unless you are in the habit of judging ideas by where they come from, instead of by the scientific evidence.
Vaccine advocates are addicted to the lazy, intellectually vapid practice of “argument by authority”. For them, all that’s required to answer the questions of vaccine dangers is to assert the CDC, WHO, and AAP as “authorities” and parrot what they say. It’s so easy! No need to look at the science, or think for yourself, according to vaccine advocates. This is absolutely foolish.
Scientific ideas and opinions must be judged by the evidence, not according to whether the source is perceived as an “authority”. All that really matters is the science and the evidence. To determine if VP is trustworthy, all you have to do is consider the opinions on these pages in view of what the science says. Then do the same for the CDC, WHO, AAP and other so-called “authorities”.
Two of the most accomplished scientists of the 20th century agree with this approach:

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” –Richard Feynman

Additionally, we remain anonymous to avoid nasty “ad hominem” personal attacks and internet harassment. Unfortunately, such tactics are commonplace in the vaccine debate. There are considerable personal and professional risks in being associated with vaccine criticism. By remaining anonymous, attention is focused on where it belongs: the science. Our goal is to encourage people to look at the scientific evidence for themselves, and remaining anonymous furthers that goal.
We intend to go public in the not-distant future.
We invite vaccine defenders to find flaws in our arguments and write critical comments.

 

[Tim Lundeen]

vaccinepapers.org is the bomb!

Check out their article on healthy-user bias, critical info: Healthy User Bias: The Fatal Flaw In Vaccine Safety Research

 

[dabdabdab]

but what's the alternative to vaccines?!

in the past even without pufas, with loads of organic food at hand, many kids died due to those diseases that are prevented now by vaccines.

it was normal for a family to lose some of their kids. they had several kids to increase the chance of continuing the bloodline.

 

[Peater]

but what's the alternative to vaccines?!

in the past even without pufas, with loads of organic food at hand, many kids died due to those diseases that are prevented now by vaccines.

it was normal for a family to lose some of their kids. they had several kids to increase the chance of continuing the bloodline.

There was hardly any sanitation or refrigeration of food then either.....

 

[dabdabdab]

There was hardly any sanitation or refrigeration of food then either.....

So you are saying that the fresh killed meat cooked with direct fire was less healthy than potrecine filled meats stored in store refrigerators?
two of my aunts died in their childhood due to not being vaccined.
the ones who got vaccined survived.

 

[Peater]

So you are saying that the fresh killed meat cooked with direct fire was less healthy than potrecine filled meats stored in store refrigerators?
two of my aunts died in their childhood due to not being vaccined.
the ones who got vaccined survived.

It's quite impressive you managed to type all that but omit what they actually died from. COVID? That's pretty popular these days, but fashions change.

I don't think that's what I said, but I will double check.

While I do, look up dysentery, and cholera.

 

[dabdabdab]

measles, smallpox, etc
the reason I didn't type that, was because I didn't know the names of those diseases in English

 

[Dave Clark]

I think Dennis Crouse cracked that code already:

Recipe to make your own Silica Water

SILICA WATER RECIPE IS BELOW Click here for a video - see below for detailed recipe. How to make Silica Water Video Eliminating Alu...

aluminum-alzheimers-autism.blogspot.com

Dennis N. Crouse's Blog

Sources of Aluminum in our daily lives

prevent-alzheimers-autism-stroke.blogspot.com

Dissolved Silica: Safe, Inexpensive Protection from Aluminum Toxicity - Holistic Primary Care

Silica—a dissolved oxide of silicon- can provide a safe, readily available, and inexpensive means of protection from aluminum toxicity, a common problem that many researchers believe to be a major risk factor for dementia, stroke, and autism.

holisticprimarycare.net

 

[dabdabdab]

I think Dennis Crouse cracked that code already:

Recipe to make your own Silica Water

SILICA WATER RECIPE IS BELOW Click here for a video - see below for detailed recipe. How to make Silica Water Video Eliminating Alu...

aluminum-alzheimers-autism.blogspot.com

Dennis N. Crouse's Blog

Sources of Aluminum in our daily lives

prevent-alzheimers-autism-stroke.blogspot.com

Dissolved Silica: Safe, Inexpensive Protection from Aluminum Toxicity - Holistic Primary Care

Silica—a dissolved oxide of silicon- can provide a safe, readily available, and inexpensive means of protection from aluminum toxicity, a common problem that many researchers believe to be a major risk factor for dementia, stroke, and autism.

holisticprimarycare.net

sorry to be off topic
what's the difference between silicone dioxide as an allergy and cancer inducing agent with this silica?
I'm interested in silica for its hair benefits but was afraid due the horror stories I read on this forum about it.

 

[Dave Clark]

sorry to be off topic
what's the difference between silicone dioxide as an allergy and cancer inducing agent with this silica?
I'm interested in silica for its hair benefits but was afraid due the horror stories I read on this forum about it.

This is orthosilicic acid, which is the soluble form found in foods, it is not the dry powder form found in supplements. Not all silica is bad, it is the form that matters, if it is unhealthy, then we are eating many healthy foods that have it in. Of course, that is a subject of debate on this forum.

 

[dabdabdab]

This is orthosilicic acid, which is the soluble form found in foods, it is not the dry powder form found in supplements. Not all silica is bad, it is the form that matters, if it is unhealthy, then we are eating many healthy foods that have it in. Of course, that is a subject of debate on this forum.

thank you a lot