Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
How is libido btw?wet dreams,morning woods m,real life excitabilitySo this is generally the point that I am trying to make clear in this thread. It's why I started it. Most if not ALL the "bad rap" that high-fat diets get is due to the fact that 99.99% of studies use HIGH PUFA!
A clear distinction must be made between high PUFA and high SAT fat diets. They are at polar opposites of the spectrum. One is highly toxic to the metabolism, while the other is highly supportive. This is the whole point of this thread.
Pretty good, I think. Have not detected any changes in such things thus far.How is libido btw?wet dreams,morning woods m,real life excitability
AllrightPretty good, I think. Have not detected any changes in such things thus far.
Exactly.So this is generally the point that I am trying to make clear in this thread. It's why I started it. Most if not ALL the "bad rap" that high-fat diets get is due to the fact that 99.99% of studies use HIGH PUFA!
I remember somewhere here in the forum Dr. Peat mentioning that he thought those were the ideal macro ratios.So, I've been shooting for an equal amount of protein, carbs, and fat (mainly saturated), by weight. This means roughly 136g/136g/136g. Here's an example of what I ate yesterday. I'm starting to think that these are the ideal macro ratios. I struggle to reach 136g carbs without starch or milk, though. A tbsp of honey and a fruit per meal gets me close.
Indeed. And the funny thing is that such a diet would still be considered high fat / low carb.I remember somewhere here in the forum Dr. Peat mentioning that he thought those were the ideal macro ratios.
I think he said something along the lines »we don’t know what are ideal macros,,,,,,,,,,,perhaps/probably 33/33//33 »and talking about calories pourcentages rather than weight pourcentageI remember somewhere here in the forum Dr. Peat mentioning that he thought those were the ideal macro ratios.
I remember that, I’d always assumed he meant by calories though!I remember somewhere here in the forum Dr. Peat mentioning that he thought those were the ideal macro ratios.
"A daily diet that includes two quarts of milk and a quart of orange juice provides enough fructose and other sugars for general resistance to stress, but larger amounts of fruit juice, honey, or other sugars can protect against increased stress, and can reverse some of the established degenerative conditions."I remember that, I’d always assumed he meant by calories though!
I have never touched thyroid and can easily handle 400g carbs in one sitting, let alone in a day. It could be an issue if hypothyroid.People taking copious amounts of thyroid probably can eat a lot more carbs than those who don't.
It's only 1300-1800kcal depending on the milk, and 70g of protein. What about the rest of the diet?"A daily diet that includes two quarts of milk and a quart of orange juice provides enough fructose and other sugars for general resistance to stress, but larger amounts of fruit juice, honey, or other sugars can protect against increased stress, and can reverse some of the established degenerative conditions."
-RP
the two quarts milk and 1 quart OJ is around 180 g carbs, but in a quote he said probably somewhere around 180-250 for most people. He consumes 400g himself
that quote was in reference to the carbs in the diet, theres still other foods that provide fat and protein like cheese, butter, gelatinous meats, seafood, eggs, etc. I personally prefer more starch, and a higher carb as opposed to only 180-250 carb, but some people feel better on more butter and saturated fats.It's only 1300-1800kcal depending on the milk, and 70g of protein. What about the rest of the diet?
No, but my LDL has always been in range, with mid-high HDL and low triglycerides. I'm not worried about oxLDL at all.Have you checked oxLDL?
So, I inverted my carb/fat macros recently (last couple months) while keeping protein at 130-140g and low or no starch, and am doing equally well, with no hunger between meals, no bloating, etc. I believe the adequate protein (130-140g in my case) keeps me satiated as well or better than extra saturated fat.
Still doing carbs? I did similar macros except more fat less protein and that usually kept me stable but am going through the reactive hypoglycemia type symptoms (with perfect numbers) and starches cause me huge problems right now. I was really interested in how the fat worked out in the long run but then you switched it! I am doing way better on 60% fat than 55% carbs. Do you still think that can work?So, I inverted my carb/fat macros recently (last couple months) while keeping protein at 130-140g and low or no starch, and am doing equally well, with no hunger between meals, no bloating, etc. I believe the adequate protein (130-140g in my case) keeps me satiated as well or better than extra saturated fat.