Any thoughts on RFK, Jr. requiring proof of vaccination or negative test result?

CiggyTardust

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2021
Messages
250
Location
Southeast US
Proof of vaccination or a negative COVID test result were apparently required for RFK, Jr.'s Christmas party. He says his wife came up with the policy and didn't inform him. Any thoughts on this? Is RFK, Jr. more controlled opposition? Or is he trustworthy?

When I listen to him speak I don't get the impression he is controlled opposition. I like to think I have very good discernment and can pick up on the character and intentions of people more than most. He seems sincere and his arguments are among the best I've ever heard for refusing vaccination.

My first thought upon hearing this dumb headline is that the poor man is cucked in his own household. If my wife humiliated me and disrespected my life's work by doing such a thing I'd be very angry with her. I spoke with my wife and she agrees it's 100% wrong and not something that should happen in a healthy marriage. Cheryl Hines being a progressive hollywood actor this behavior doesn't surprise me at all.
 

Doc Sandoz

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
821
I don't think he's controlled opposition at all.

The man is passionate and you don't write a book like his by being "controlled opposition".

He's still however, someone with deep ties to the establishment and he's not right about everything so he's bound to be attacked/make mistakes etc.
To some, any and all opposition is "controlled" opposition. I don't buy that accusation as regards RFKJ either, Mr Chibbs.

I know one cause for suspicion is he has said he believes over-population is a problem - a finite world with finite resources cannot handle infinite population growth. Simple mathematical logic in my view. He also believes the world of nature is threatened, obvious to anyone willing to look, which once again boils down to too many people consuming too much - and which incidentally is demanded in a debt-fueled "capitalist" economy that must either grow exponentially or implode.

But, he has also stated that in his opinion the way to deal with overpopulation is NOT eugenics, but by reducing large families in the third world by education and raising living standards. Now that may be pie in the sky - particularly because it is overconsumption due to overpopulation that is the primary issue, but it is certainly not a eugenicist point of view. Simply disagreeing with the Anti-eugenicist proposition that the population can go on growing forever (usually and ironically justified with the idea that technology will provide the answers), does not make him a closet eugenicist or controlled opposition.
 
Last edited:

Kram

Member
Joined
May 8, 2017
Messages
384
He’s 100% controlled ops. Anyone pushing the China narrative is. He was also a Junkie in the 80s and a shady figure in general.
No chance he is controlled opposition. Have you read his latest book on Fauci? The guy has been trying to expose big pharma and the CDC for 20 years. Here is a nice little summary on how he got involved.


How RFK Jr. went from "a good guy" to an "anti-vaxxer"​

I talked to him this morning about what led him down the anti-vax path nearly 20 years ago. Here's the story, condensed to make it a quick read.​

Here’s the quick summary of the story of how science convinced RFK Jr to become a truthteller about vaccines:
  1. Back in the 1990’s, RFK was trying to get public attention about the presence of mercury in fish due to pollution from coal plants. This is well known. He was respected as an environmentalist. Everyone (except the coal companies) loved him.
  2. When he gave lectures, he noticed that a half dozen women would always arrive early and get seats at the front. After each lecture, they would try to get him interested in vaccines causing autism due to the mercury in the vaccines. They sought him out because he was a force and knew about mercury. They thought it would be a perfect fit.
  3. But every time, Kennedy rejected their efforts. He wanted to stay focused on his environmental mission.
  4. Finally, one of the women showed up on his doorstep with an 18” high stack of technical papers printed from medical journals. She said, “I’m not leaving until you read these.” That got his attention. He read all the papers. He was alarmed by what he had read.
  5. He then contacted his friends (they were still his friends at that time) in the CDC and FDA asking them about why they were recommending pregnant women avoid fish, while at the same time recommending these same women get vaccines containing lots of mercury. None of the people at the agencies could answer his questions. They all said, “Talk to Paul Offit.”
  6. In 2005, RFK called Offit. Offit said the reason why it was OK was that the mercury in thimerosal only lasted a week in the bloodstream; it was quickly eliminated per Pichichero (see this reference for a discussion).
  7. But RFK had read all the papers. He knew he was being lied to. He immediately cited the pivotal study (by Burbacher in April 2005) that looked at where the mercury “disappeared to.” It went out of the bloodstream and accumulated in the brain where it permanently remained. Offit was speechless. Offit didn’t think anyone knew about the Burbacher study. Offit then acknowledged he knew about the Burbacher study, but said that other papers had overturned that study and offered to send RFK the references. Those references never arrived. That sealed the deal for RFK and led to his famous “Deadly Immunity” article in July 2005.
  8. Shortly thereafter, Lyn Redwood, one of RFK’s friends, pointed him to the Simpsonwood transcripts showing the CDC knew about the dangers of thimerosal in July1999 and discussed it in a meeting on June 7 and 8, 2000 where the transcripts remained secret until finally released via FOIA request. It turns out, there were several versions of the Verstraeten paper (see “A “SIGNAL” DISAPPEARS ACROSS FIVE GENERATIONS OF STUDY”) each version making the effect on autism smaller (7.62, 2.48, 1.69 was the effect size on autism where 2 or more is very concerning) but there was an admission in an email on December 17, 1999 that Verstraeten sent to colleagues Robert Davis and Frank DeStefano under the subject line “It just won’t go away,” by which one presumes he meant the association between thimerosal and NDDs. At the Simpsonwood meeting, the scientists admitted that they couldn’t rule out that the mercury could be causing a whole host of diseases. They also pointed out that the meeting transcript might be disclosed via FOIA requests, so people were quite guarded in their comments. It was clearly serious because they gathered experts from all over the country for an urgent meeting that lasted nearly two days. They wouldn’t have done that if there wasn’t a serious problem.
In short, RFK Jr. was persuaded the vaccines were unsafe based on science and how people acted to deliberately cover it up. It’s no more complicated than that.

Postscript​

Here we are today, over twenty years after thimerosal was known to cause problems. We know for sure it causes mercury accumulation in the brain. Here’s the most recent review showing RFK was right: 22 studies showing ethyl- and methylmercury cross the blood-brain barrier using the same LAT system: “In total, these studies indicate that ethylmercury-containing compounds and Thimerosal readily cross the BBB, convert, for the most part, to highly toxic inorganic mercury-containing compounds, which significantly and persistently bind to tissues in the brain, even in the absence of concurrent detectable blood mercury levels.” In short, it goes from the blood to your brain where it stays for the rest of your life.
Of course, the CDC is still lying about it today on their website:

This is why the CDC doesn’t want to debate Kennedy, me, or anyone else on vaccine safety. They would be exposed as deliberately lying to the public. They can’t have that happen. This is why they are relentless in attacking RFK Jr.
If the truth ever got out to the public, say in a Joe Rogan interview, they’d be toast. Remember, you heard it here first :).

Fast forward to today​

Clearly, the CDC can completely get away with lies about the safety of thimerosal even 20 years later.
So they are going to use similar techniques to convince everyone the current vaccines are safe, even in light of all the evidence that it isn’t. And they’ll get away with it for decades even after killing over 150,000 Americans in 2021 without anyone noticing.
Silencing critics through censorship, de-platforming, ad hominem attacks, and refusing to debate are all techniques that engage in today to hide the truth and keep it hidden for decades.
Any doctor or pharmacist or other medical professional who speaks against the narrative will be punished through loss of ability to earn a living, loss of medical licensing, or in some cases, loss of life. I can’t tell you how many calls I get a day of medical boards going after people who speak out when they discover that the vaccines are killing and/or injuring people.
The censorship and intimidation grows stronger and stronger every day because more and more people are waking up to the truth.

How you can help​

Please share this article widely on social media. Together, we can wake people up.
And if you are a first time reader to my substack, please consider subscribing. It is free (payment is optional).
 

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
This rabbit hole goes deep doesn’t it.

The press. The media. Hollywood. Lawyers. Optics. Lies. Evil. Etc etc etc

But here’s the thing:
These people he is going against in his new book- the government and pharma and the globalist....
These are the same people who killed his uncle.

There is vengeance to be had.

Is he a pure voice of truth? Absolutely not.
Controlled opposition? I think not.

He’s a man on a mission to avenge.
 

EchoTango

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
120
This rabbit hole goes deep doesn’t it.

The press. The media. Hollywood. Lawyers. Optics. Lies. Evil. Etc etc etc

But here’s the thing:
These people he is going against in his new book- the government and pharma and the globalist....
These are the same people who killed his uncle.

There is vengeance to be had.

Is he a pure voice of truth? Absolutely not.
Controlled opposition? I think not.

He’s a man on a mission to avenge.
Agreed regarding the motive to avenge.
Not only his uncle JFK, but his father RFK was also assassinated.
 

AlaskaJono

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Messages
941
No chance he is controlled opposition. Have you read his latest book on Fauci? The guy has been trying to expose big pharma and the CDC for 20 years. Here is a nice little summary on how he got involved.


How RFK Jr. went from "a good guy" to an "anti-vaxxer"​

I talked to him this morning about what led him down the anti-vax path nearly 20 years ago. Here's the story, condensed to make it a quick read.​

Here’s the quick summary of the story of how science convinced RFK Jr to become a truthteller about vaccines:
  1. Back in the 1990’s, RFK was trying to get public attention about the presence of mercury in fish due to pollution from coal plants. This is well known. He was respected as an environmentalist. Everyone (except the coal companies) loved him.
  2. When he gave lectures, he noticed that a half dozen women would always arrive early and get seats at the front. After each lecture, they would try to get him interested in vaccines causing autism due to the mercury in the vaccines. They sought him out because he was a force and knew about mercury. They thought it would be a perfect fit.
  3. But every time, Kennedy rejected their efforts. He wanted to stay focused on his environmental mission.
  4. Finally, one of the women showed up on his doorstep with an 18” high stack of technical papers printed from medical journals. She said, “I’m not leaving until you read these.” That got his attention. He read all the papers. He was alarmed by what he had read.
  5. He then contacted his friends (they were still his friends at that time) in the CDC and FDA asking them about why they were recommending pregnant women avoid fish, while at the same time recommending these same women get vaccines containing lots of mercury. None of the people at the agencies could answer his questions. They all said, “Talk to Paul Offit.”
  6. In 2005, RFK called Offit. Offit said the reason why it was OK was that the mercury in thimerosal only lasted a week in the bloodstream; it was quickly eliminated per Pichichero (see this reference for a discussion).
  7. But RFK had read all the papers. He knew he was being lied to. He immediately cited the pivotal study (by Burbacher in April 2005) that looked at where the mercury “disappeared to.” It went out of the bloodstream and accumulated in the brain where it permanently remained. Offit was speechless. Offit didn’t think anyone knew about the Burbacher study. Offit then acknowledged he knew about the Burbacher study, but said that other papers had overturned that study and offered to send RFK the references. Those references never arrived. That sealed the deal for RFK and led to his famous “Deadly Immunity” article in July 2005.
  8. Shortly thereafter, Lyn Redwood, one of RFK’s friends, pointed him to the Simpsonwood transcripts showing the CDC knew about the dangers of thimerosal in July1999 and discussed it in a meeting on June 7 and 8, 2000 where the transcripts remained secret until finally released via FOIA request. It turns out, there were several versions of the Verstraeten paper (see “A “SIGNAL” DISAPPEARS ACROSS FIVE GENERATIONS OF STUDY”) each version making the effect on autism smaller (7.62, 2.48, 1.69 was the effect size on autism where 2 or more is very concerning) but there was an admission in an email on December 17, 1999 that Verstraeten sent to colleagues Robert Davis and Frank DeStefano under the subject line “It just won’t go away,” by which one presumes he meant the association between thimerosal and NDDs. At the Simpsonwood meeting, the scientists admitted that they couldn’t rule out that the mercury could be causing a whole host of diseases. They also pointed out that the meeting transcript might be disclosed via FOIA requests, so people were quite guarded in their comments. It was clearly serious because they gathered experts from all over the country for an urgent meeting that lasted nearly two days. They wouldn’t have done that if there wasn’t a serious problem.
In short, RFK Jr. was persuaded the vaccines were unsafe based on science and how people acted to deliberately cover it up. It’s no more complicated than that.

Postscript​

Here we are today, over twenty years after thimerosal was known to cause problems. We know for sure it causes mercury accumulation in the brain. Here’s the most recent review showing RFK was right: 22 studies showing ethyl- and methylmercury cross the blood-brain barrier using the same LAT system: “In total, these studies indicate that ethylmercury-containing compounds and Thimerosal readily cross the BBB, convert, for the most part, to highly toxic inorganic mercury-containing compounds, which significantly and persistently bind to tissues in the brain, even in the absence of concurrent detectable blood mercury levels.” In short, it goes from the blood to your brain where it stays for the rest of your life.
Of course, the CDC is still lying about it today on their website:

This is why the CDC doesn’t want to debate Kennedy, me, or anyone else on vaccine safety. They would be exposed as deliberately lying to the public. They can’t have that happen. This is why they are relentless in attacking RFK Jr.

Fast forward to today​

Clearly, the CDC can completely get away with lies about the safety of thimerosal even 20 years later.
So they are going to use similar techniques to convince everyone the current vaccines are safe, even in light of all the evidence that it isn’t. And they’ll get away with it for decades even after killing over 150,000 Americans in 2021 without anyone noticing.
Silencing critics through censorship, de-platforming, ad hominem attacks, and refusing to debate are all techniques that engage in today to hide the truth and keep it hidden for decades.
Any doctor or pharmacist or other medical professional who speaks against the narrative will be punished through loss of ability to earn a living, loss of medical licensing, or in some cases, loss of life. I can’t tell you how many calls I get a day of medical boards going after people who speak out when they discover that the vaccines are killing and/or injuring people.
The censorship and intimidation grows stronger and stronger every day because more and more people are waking up to the truth.

How you can help​

Please share this article widely on social media. Together, we can wake people up.
And if you are a first time reader to my substack, please consider subscribing. It is free (payment is optional).
Yes this Mercury business as in using it as an adjuvant for flu vaccine jabs possibly stopped here in Australia in 2021. Now they are using Squalene. Remember the Gulf War Sydrome?
From the NPS website (https://www.nps.org.au/about-us) in Australia: Another NGO to help with, you know, prescribing medications and promoting health through health technologies
Other ingredients
Adjuvant: MF59C.1: containing squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate, sodium citrate dihydrate, citric acid monohydrate, water for injection.
Other: sodium chloride, potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate , dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, calcium chloride dihydrate, water for injection.

IMO there are so many opposition peeps popping up, so we all must use discrimination. But as stated above, RFK jr has devoted years to the cause of health and uncovering 'dirty secrets' is a good guy in my book. Perfect? We are all human, most of us are not saints. Besides as this last 2 years shows us some obvious controlled opposition may be full of useful information. (Dr David Martin, Malone, Vanden Bossche, etc..).

For what it's worth I wanted to believe Dr Mikovitz and her sincerity regarding helping people with serious illnesses with her knowledge of Biochemistry. I know now that the entire medical/biology/microbiology/Pharma Cartel have duped quite intelligent people with faux science. So I still think she is sincere but buys into the virus scam. How many infectious diseases were cured by the NIAID since it's inception. More like deception. Public ($)/Private Partnership to discover ways to inject sheeple. Follow the money.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom