ANDREW KAUFMAN ON FALLACY AND FRAUD OF VIROLOGY

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Excellent explanation. In other words, the so called "isolates" are an abstraction of reality, the "genome sequencing" is an abstraction of that abstraction, and the PCR test is an abstraction of the genome abstraction based on the "isolate" abstraction.

Jon Rappoport posted a nice Step by Step breakdown that Dr. Kaufman did identifying the problems with the so called "isolation."


If you search for any "Isolation" paper, and read the "Materials and Methods," you will notice they never do anything to separate any Human DNA or cells from the so called "Virus" cells, and they will ADD stuff to the "isolate," rather than take away all the non-virus material.


Cell culture, limiting dilution, and isolation​

Vero CCL-81 cells were used for isolation and initial passage. Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat inactivated fetal bovine serum(5 or 10%) and antibiotic/antimyotic (GIBCO). Both NP an OP swabs were used for virus isolation. For the isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, 50 μl serum free DMEM was pipetted into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate. One-hundred μl clinical specimens were pipetted into column 1, and then serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. Vero cells were trypsinized and resuspended in DMEM + 10% FBS + 2X Penicillin-Streptomycin + 2X antibiotic − antimycotic + 2 X amphotericin B at 2.5 × 105 cells / ml. One hundred μl of cell suspension were added directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. The inoculated cultures were grown in a humidified 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effect (CPE) daily. Standard plaque assays were used for SARS-CoV-2 based on both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV protocols (19, 20).

Kaufman is correct, virologists have apparently redefined "isolation" to mean the exact opposite of the dictionary definition.


isolate​

[ verb ahy-suh-leyt; noun, adjective ahy-suh-lit, -leyt ]SHOW IPA


verb (used with object), i·so·lat·ed, i·so·lat·ing.

to set or place apart; detach or separate so as to be alone.

Medicine/Medical. to keep (an infected person) from contact with noninfected persons; quarantine.

Chemistry, Bacteriology. to obtain (a substance or microorganism) in an uncombined or pure state.

How does adding things like fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, and digestive enzymes keep anything in a "pure" state?
 

Perry Staltic

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
8,186
I'm pretty sure they do the same thing with prions. In other words, Prion "infection" is most likely an artifact of the materials/processes used.
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
Excellent explanation. In other words, the so called "isolates" are an abstraction of reality, the "genome sequencing" is an abstraction of that abstraction, and the PCR test is an abstraction of the genome abstraction based on the "isolate" abstraction.
You distilled the essence of the deception very well.

The abstraction and digital virtualization of an imagined virus. An using the abstraction as a proxy for the imagined virus.

And developing a test based on this illusion.

An illusion built on layers of illusions that with each layer added becomes more and more a cult of beliefs divorced from reality.
 
OP
Riesensackteil
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Messages
499
"When the stress is more generalized, so that the cells survive, the more sensitive sections of DNA are rearranged within the cell. Some of them may escape as infective particles"

Ray Peat
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Gary Null made a documentary challenging a lot of the Myths of AIDS, and HIV. Many of the researchers in the documentary bring up some of the same points that Kaufman is bringing up. The problems with the "discovery" of HIV and it's "causal role" in AIDS is discussed starting around 16 minutes, and the problems with AIDS/HIV testing is discussed starting at 32 minutes (and look at some of the personalities who would later have big roles in COVID)


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRCyk0zdBxw


Same Fraud, Different "Pandemic."
 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,836
Gary Null made a documentary challenging a lot of the Myths of AIDS, and HIV. Many of the researchers in the documentary bring up some of the same points that Kaufman is bringing up. The problems with the "discovery" of HIV and it's "causal role" in AIDS is discussed starting around 16 minutes, and the problems with AIDS/HIV testing is discussed starting at 32 minutes (and look at some of the personalities who would later have big roles in COVID)


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRCyk0zdBxw


Same Fraud, Different "Pandemic."

Thank you for posting this @tankasnowgod.
This game today is very much being played out of the same playbook.
I am always surprised that when the experts (in this case Bob Gallo and Anthony Fauci), say that the virus has been studied and it causes AIDS why no reporter actually challenges them on the statement and asks to review their data or studies to back up their statements (at least on camera) perhaps they do but they are dismissed or fired.
Surprised at the lack of transmission in sexual contact at least using the penis and vaginal format as well.
Many many excellent points of view to contradict the narrative on this.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
I am always surprised that when the experts (in this case Bob Gallo and Anthony Fauci), say that the virus has been studied and it causes AIDS why no reporter actually challenges them on the statement and asks to review their data or studies to back up their statements (at least on camera) perhaps they do but they are dismissed or fired.
Right?

The clips shown in the documentary don't look like they were a good format for that sort of follow up, it seemed they were both interviewed (maybe by a group) at a conference. But, in more direct interviews, you have to wonder why it does happen more often.

A delightful and surprising exception was the interview Eugenio Derbez did with Anthony Fauci. He is a Mexican Actor, Comedian, and Producer, but he is also apparently a better and more thorough interviewer than anyone in the Corporate American Media-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiB3eK3btOE


 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,836
Here is Andrew Kaufman detailing the even further lunacy of the "variant discoveries," which don't even have a bogus isolation to claim that they exist, or a bogus test to detect them-


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3afWsXJUybnh/

Thanks for posting this @tankasnowgod. I recently read on Paul Alexander’s sub stack that a positive PCR test for SARS COV2 does not tell you if you have tested positive for SARS COV2, influenza or respiratory syncicial virus.
I know that the Drosten PCR test was a total sham in Europe and it is one of the focal points for the Reiner Fuellmich court case. But to actually see how they turn a negative test into a positive result and turn pure speculation into fear and reinforce that fear with,”appropriate measures for safety”, and then use coercion to take the vaccine I order to,”get back to normal”.
These are interesting times, and on one hand it is just incredible to be able to live through this and to see how the perpetrators behind this manipulate us. But I cannot ignore the total lack of concern for life and the ease to sacrifice life in order to inflate the numbers of lives lost by denying treatments that are both readily available and quite affordable. That is the part that will really need to be looked at closely and what the appropriate punishment for such crimes committed on a global scale for all those involved in this scheme.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Cross-posting this here, for anyone who wonders how they could isolate a "spike protein" from a "virus" that itself hasn't been properly isolated or purified-

This experiment got me thinking...... how did they manage to isolate and purify the "Spike Protein" from SARS-Cov-2, when they never even managed to isolate and purify this "Novel Corona Virus" from the other cellular material when they allegedly "discovered" it in the first place?


The short answer is..... they didn't. The study itself doesn't even make such a claim (contrary to how the title is written). The whole story is told in right here, in the Abstract-



Did you gloss over that word "recombinant?" You shouldn't. It means this is a synthetic protein.










As always, the "Materials and Methods" section gives further detail-





Here is the listing from ProSci-


They can claim this synthetic protein is the same as the "Spike Protein" from "SARS-Cov-2, but since neither the alleged virus, nor the alleged spike protein has been isolated and purified, how would anyone possibly know?

Although, since ProSci charges over $500 for 0.1 mg (!!!!), I'm guessing they don't care. And probably prefer no one ask that question.
 

DeadCatBounce

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
174
Location
West Side
Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan and Stefan Lanka are the only ones making sense in this absurd World. Viruses do NOT cause disease and cannot possibly do cause disease. Its all BS and people need to wake up to the truth.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom