jay123
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2017
- Messages
- 288
Thanks for that perspective. I have had similar experiments with different diets as you did. I fortunately did not have any crashes or digestive issues. Yep the ego is powerful.Appreciate it.
I got sucked into reductionism multiple times. Each time eventually turned into a ideology for me.
It started young with bodybuilding and "protein grows muscles", "sugar makes you fat", etc.
It then moved into "plant based" and "raw", as somehow better than animal foods because some pretty shotty rationalizations and a piss poor physiology base (this lead to a surgery in highshcool that was highly unnecessary and lead to lasting digestive issues to this day).
Then it moved further into paleo, keto, and low carb, with the insulin hypothesis, and poor understandings of the mechanisms of cellular respiration.
It was further amplified with mTOR, longevity, hormesis, arguments involving intermittent fasting, caloric restriction, protein modified fasts, extreme exercise, cold exposure etc.
Then my ideology moved to the other side of the spectrum ideologically, while keeping the same general framework of reductionism and ideology, with my first attempts at implementing a so called "Peat diet" and all the lovely personal experiments that came with that.
And it finally peaked with me developing some serious digestive issues, that finally opened my eyes for the need to value my personal experience, actually dig deep into topics, and ultimately experiment with those topics to develop wisdom around them. A key ability I gained at this point was the perspective of the tentative nature of knowledge, and the ability to uncouple the idea of a knowledge from being a part of my ego/ identity.
The nice thing is, despite the damage I did along the way, I developed a large base of reference experiences, and solutions.
Even though I was entangled in ideologies for stretches of time, I wasn't ever so ideologically invested that I wouldn't break the rules if I felt like breaking the rules served my larger picture, which was my health. A lot of this rule breaking was unconscious instinct and intuition, rather than intellectual analysis. The intellectual analysis followed the instinctual action.
I was also consistently open to experimenting with things throughout the entire process, because an idea would hit me like an itch I couldn't scratch until I experimented with it.
Overall, while I classify where I was at in each phase as an ideology, I wasn't ever a zealot about anything. Things were more like experiments I had to test out, because I absolutely had to know what would happen, and I had to know if it would improve my health situation overall.
It just would have been helpful if I had a more cautious approach to start, as I messed myself up pretty bad a few times lol.