A third of COVID survivors suffer neurological or mental disorders: study

Mito

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2016
Messages
2,554
“One in three COVID-19 survivors in a study of more than 230,000 mostly American patients were diagnosed with a brain or psychiatric disorder within six months, suggesting the pandemic could lead to a wave of mental and neurological problems, scientists said on Tuesday.

Researchers who conducted the analysis said it was not clear how the virus was linked to psychiatric conditions such as anxiety and depression, but that these were the most common diagnoses among the 14 disorders they looked at.

Post-COVID cases of stroke, dementia and other neurological disorders were rarer, the researchers said, but were still significant, especially in those who had severe COVID-19.

“Although the individual risks for most disorders are small, the effect across the whole population may be substantial,” said Paul Harrison, a professor of psychiatry at Oxford University who co-led the work.

Max Taquet, also an Oxford psychiatrist who worked with Harrison, noted that the study was not able to examine the biological or psychological mechanisms involved, but said urgent research is needed to identify these “with a view to preventing or treating them”.

Health experts are increasingly concerned by evidence of higher risks of brain and mental health disorders among COVID-19 survivors. A previous study by the same researchers found last year that 20% of COVID-19 survivors were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder within three months.

The new findings, published in the Lancet Psychiatry journal, analysed health records of 236,379 COVID-19 patients, mostly from the United States, and found 34% had been diagnosed with neurological or psychiatric illnesses within six months.

The disorders were significantly more common in COVID-19 patients than in comparison groups of people who recovered from flu or other respiratory infections over the same time period, the scientists said, suggesting COVID-19 had a specific impact.

Anxiety, at 17%, and mood disorders, at 14%, were the most common, and did not appear to be related to how mild or severe the patient’s COVID-19 infection had been.”


 

Giraffe

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
3,730
The spike protein - if it gets into the blood stream - can cause neurological symptoms, but this is a rare event in natural infections.

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg said:
Again, a normal acute respiratory infection without fever or severer symptoms (> 99%) does not come along with corona-spike protein reaching the blood and does not initiate risky generalized immune alarms.

(link)

To use spike proteins in vaccines and to inject them intramuscularly is madness.

The most likely cause of neurological symptoms long after the disease is the intubation in hospital and the induced coma that comes with it. Intubation also can be the reason why viruses enter the blood stream. It has been the standard protocol in many countries to intubate the covid patients early.

There is not much information in the article linked in the original post. It looks like the study has not been published yet, there is only this Lancet news release and this is the link to the study, but it's not gone live yet.
 
Last edited:

burtlancast

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
3,263
The Lancet is famous for being utterly corrupt.
The recent hydroxychloroquine incident is a perfect example, but hardly the first one.
 

ddjd

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
6,725
FEAR CAMPAIGN ON FULL THROTTLE!!!!!! GET VACCINATED NOW!!!!
 

Perry Staltic

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
8,186
The most likely cause of neurological symptoms long after the disease is the intubation in hospital and the induced coma that comes with it. Intubation also can be the reason why viruses enter the blood stream. It has been the standard protocol in many countries to intubate the covid patients early.

Definitely this. Anyone who was tubed needs to be excluded from any long covid statistics because neurological and other damage from mechanical ventilation, especially for extended periods like covid patients typically endure, is common.
 

Fred

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
487
“One in three COVID-19 survivors in a study of more than 230,000 mostly American patients were diagnosed with a brain or psychiatric disorder within six months, suggesting the pandemic could lead to a wave of mental and neurological problems, scientists said on Tuesday.

Researchers who conducted the analysis said it was not clear how the virus was linked to psychiatric conditions such as anxiety and depression, but that these were the most common diagnoses among the 14 disorders they looked at.

Post-COVID cases of stroke, dementia and other neurological disorders were rarer, the researchers said, but were still significant, especially in those who had severe COVID-19.

“Although the individual risks for most disorders are small, the effect across the whole population may be substantial,” said Paul Harrison, a professor of psychiatry at Oxford University who co-led the work.

Max Taquet, also an Oxford psychiatrist who worked with Harrison, noted that the study was not able to examine the biological or psychological mechanisms involved, but said urgent research is needed to identify these “with a view to preventing or treating them”.

Health experts are increasingly concerned by evidence of higher risks of brain and mental health disorders among COVID-19 survivors. A previous study by the same researchers found last year that 20% of COVID-19 survivors were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder within three months.

The new findings, published in the Lancet Psychiatry journal, analysed health records of 236,379 COVID-19 patients, mostly from the United States, and found 34% had been diagnosed with neurological or psychiatric illnesses within six months.

The disorders were significantly more common in COVID-19 patients than in comparison groups of people who recovered from flu or other respiratory infections over the same time period, the scientists said, suggesting COVID-19 had a specific impact.

Anxiety, at 17%, and mood disorders, at 14%, were the most common, and did not appear to be related to how mild or severe the patient’s COVID-19 infection had been.”


PCR test is at least 75% false-positives using Fauci's own standard of replication-competence (as mentioned in TWiV #641). So many/most of these people were probably suffering from a different condition and/or the consequences of treatment regimes.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
“One in three COVID-19 survivors in a study of more than 230,000 mostly American patients were diagnosed with a brain or psychiatric disorder within six months, suggesting the pandemic could lead to a wave of mental and neurological problems, scientists said on Tuesday.

Researchers who conducted the analysis said it was not clear how the virus was linked to psychiatric conditions such as anxiety and depression, but that these were the most common diagnoses among the 14 disorders they looked at.


Probably because of the media's and governments' grotesque lies about Bat Plague.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Health experts are increasingly concerned by evidence of higher risks of brain and mental health disorders among COVID-19 survivors. A previous study by the same researchers found last year that 20% of COVID-19 survivors were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder within three months.

So uh, are these researchers aware of what a full year of isolation and 15+ months of doom pron and propaganda can do to a person's mental state?

The entire human population is basically Picard after being tortured by the Cardassians-



(Remember, the Cardassians are NOT the offspring of one of OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" Lawyers).

I don't know if it's scientists that are completely oblivious to the obvious, or whoever wrote the press release for Reuters.
 

Tim Lundeen

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
396
I do think that spike can cause blood clots, micro clots in the brain would cause brain damage. The vaccines do the same:

"...what I am currently struggling with is the failure to report the reality of the morbidity caused by our current vaccination program within the health service and staff population. The levels of sickness after vaccination is unprecedented and staff are getting very sick and some with neurological symptoms which is having a huge impact on the health service function. Even the young and healthy are off for days, some for weeks, and some requiring medical treatment. Whole teams are being taken out as they went to get vaccinated together.
"Mandatory vaccination in this instance is stupid, unethical and irresponsible when it comes to protecting our staff and public health. "
Re: Do doctors have to have the covid-19 vaccine?
 

drwill

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2021
Messages
10
PCR test is at least 75% false-positives using Fauci's own standard of replication-competence (as mentioned in TWiV #641). So many/most of these people were probably suffering from a different condition and/or the consequences of treatment regimes.
Actually the false positive rate is 0.8% to 4%. Maybe you red .75 percent.
 

drwill

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2021
Messages
10
Definitely this. Anyone who was tubed needs to be excluded from any long covid statistics because neurological and other damage from mechanical ventilation, especially for extended periods like covid patients typically endure, is common.
Being intubated or put on a ventilator is really hard on a person. Plus only the sickest have that fine to them.

It’s a large number of people but a small percentage of the people who get covid. Of the people who get hospitalized, only 10% are intubated. Many of them do not make it. Only 10-20% of people who get covid end up being hospitalized.

Intubation wouldn’t explain the huge difference they saw.

I hope they are able do so more detailed research to see if they can discover a cause or way to avoid it.
 

Perry Staltic

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
8,186
Being intubated or put on a ventilator is really hard on a person. Plus only the sickest have that fine to them.

It’s a large number of people but a small percentage of the people who get covid. Of the people who get hospitalized, only 10% are intubated. Many of them do not make it. Only 10-20% of people who get covid end up being hospitalized.

Intubation wouldn’t explain the huge difference they saw.

I hope they are able do so more detailed research to see if they can discover a cause or way to avoid it.

So was your point that patients who survived the ventilator and later had problems should or shouldn't be excluded from long covid statistics?
 
Last edited:

Fred

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
487
Actually the false positive rate is 0.8% to 4%. Maybe you red .75 percent.
Yes, the test is nearly 100% accurate in the sense that it is able to reliably find something with a particular genetic sequence, if done properly (but videos of labs processing covid samples have shown that it is NOT being done correctly). Anyway, it's the INTERPRETATION of the positive result... that is where the problems come in. Kary Mullis, the test inventor, talked about this a number of times, saying "with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody" .... and therefore "PCR can't tell you if you're sick". So as a diagnostic tool for the infectious disease called "covid 19", it is 75% false-positives, using Fauci's own standard of replication competence. Research the relationship between CT value and replication competence if you doubt this.
 

Perry Staltic

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
8,186
Actually the false positive rate is 0.8% to 4%. Maybe you red .75 percent.

He was referring to replication competence, ie, infectious virus. PCR tests run at cycle thresholds (Ct) greater than 34 are detecting mostly viral particles, not whole infectious virus (per Dr Fauci). Most tests are run at around 40 Ct, which means they are essentially worthless for determining anything of value.
 

Kozak

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2018
Messages
208
PCR.png
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
It's 100% false positives above 35. Setting the threshold to 40 CT is an OBVIOUS sign that the pandemic is intentionally hyped.

And even at 40 CT, they could still only re-brand 2.5% of deaths in 2020, and have a "pandemic" come in around 7th place (or lower) in deaths worldwide. The numbers of deaths from 2017 are a good surrogate-

All Cause Mortality.png



Sports reporting is more honest at this point. They don't gush and do story after story on the team that came in 7th in the playoffs, while totally ignoring the winner and opponent in the championship game/series.
 

Fred

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
487
And even at 40 CT, they could still only re-brand 2.5% of deaths in 2020, and have a "pandemic" come in around 7th place (or lower) in deaths worldwide. The numbers of deaths from 2017 are a good surrogate-

View attachment 22634


Sports reporting is more honest at this point. They don't gush and do story after story on the team that came in 7th in the playoffs, while totally ignoring the winner and opponent in the championship game/series.
And this assumes that the test is truly specific and that SARS-CoV-2 actually has any unique properties compared to any other coronavirus. Neither of these have been proven in the real world. PS - I like the "Conflict" category, separate from homicide and terrorism.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom