Then you admit your other statement was incorrect? What Dr. Brix said directly contradicts it.
No I don’t. Please explain what the contradiction is that you see?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Then you admit your other statement was incorrect? What Dr. Brix said directly contradicts it.
thanks to the lockdownPast experience. Viruses that disseminate widely into a population don't tend to just go away, they diminish during the summer but return the following cold/flu season. It happened with the Spanish Flu, H1N1, and it's why we have four endemic coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 may not behave the same way, but it would be unwise to assume it won't until we are certain that it won't.
Too bad the testing still sucks and were those tested not a majority of those already sick, symptomatic and severe? How can that not make this more deadly than it is. Plus herd immunity will be reached before that point if we end this stupid lockdown, or at least open up schools.A death rate of 0,33 % with everyone contaminated in the USA in one year equals one millions death and 3000 death per day in average.
No lockdowns for the other viruses I mentioned and they didn't disappear. Herd immunity doesn't guarantee that a virus will be eradicated. One factor is mutation rate, with very conflicting reports when it comes to SARS-CoV-2. Another factor is length of immunity, which we also don't have answers to at this point.thanks to the lockdown
His sample group could have been biased as well, people suspecting they had COVID-19 and wanting confirmation. Another argument I've seen, and I don't know how valid it could be, is that antibodies developed through other coronavirus infections could trigger a positive test without actually granting immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Perhaps someone with more knowledge could expound upon it.I keep going back to Dr. Ioannidis’ clip about covid serum testing in California and the numbers being much higher but mortality rate is much lower due to extrapolation of sample group. He’s somebody I’m more inclined to believe, not the CDC, WHO or other fraud organizations pumping out hot garbage.
His sample group could have been biased as well, people suspecting they had COVID-19 and wanting confirmation. Another argument I've seen, and I don't know how valid it could be, is that antibodies developed through other coronavirus infections could trigger a positive test without actually granting immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Perhaps someone with more knowledge could expound upon it.
Yup the Ethical Skeptic has nice charts of this info on Twitter. How do I upload a pic to this thread from my phone?The L.A County Study used another randomized sample group with the same antibody test kit as Santa Clara.
There was follow up assessment on the specificity and found no false positives. So the UCLA study affirmed the Santa Clara Stanford study. All of the serologic test I've read (5+) testings put CV-19 CFR in the flu range.
Majority of the all cause excess deaths this year are over the age of 70. We already know over 99% had comorbidities, and regarding in the 1% range, the head forensic doctor from Hamburg who went against CDC/WHO guidelines to examine postmortem found half of the confirmed deaths "would all have died in the course of this year".
There will be more mass serum studies on the way, which will show how massively inappropriate the media has handled CV coverage.
Maybe they don't disappear but they aren't made to linger and destroy life as we know it.No lockdowns for the other viruses I mentioned and they didn't disappear. Herd immunity doesn't guarantee that a virus will be eradicated. One factor is mutation rate, with very conflicting reports when it comes to SARS-CoV-2. Another factor is length of immunity, which we also don't have answers to at this point.
What gives me pause is that the test maker's own information sheet says this: "Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E."There was follow up assessment on the specificity and found no false positives. So the UCLA study affirmed the Santa Clara Stanford study. All of the serologic test I've read (5+) testings put CV-19 CFR in the flu range
Wouldn't this be considered part of the false positive error margin?What gives me pause is that the test maker's own information sheet says this: "Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E."
https://imgcdn.mckesson.com/CumulusWeb/Click_and_learn/COVID19_Package_Insert_Rapid.pdf
Yup listen to this from cook county 14:40 on especially after the Doc comes in.Bottomline, nearly every death is being categorized as covid19, and the death rate is calculated against a tiny tiny number of people who actually were tested, while the real pool of infected people is 100x that number. The real death rate is typical of flu viruses.
Nobody cares when millions every year die of typical influenza and pneumonia, or even tuberculosis.
To compound the issue, everybody who needs care for other issues right now are not getting it, and they tend to die in larger numbers because of the lack of health infrastructure for anything that isn't covid19.
It's a real virus, but as Peat said, isn't anything out of the ordinary in terms of fatalities, and it seems to me like a joint exercise between some major governments and industry for ill designs.
The only reason for the panic is that people aren't aware that every winter, millions of people die every year across the developed countries.
What gives me pause is that the test maker's own information sheet says this: "Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E."
https://imgcdn.mckesson.com/CumulusWeb/Click_and_learn/COVID19_Package_Insert_Rapid.pdf
Also not to derail too hard here but it's worth watching the video referenced in the new One Radio Peat interview where Dr. Kaufman goes over the "novel" virus and previous SARS in relation to Koch's postulates.What gives me pause is that the test maker's own information sheet says this: "Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E."
https://imgcdn.mckesson.com/CumulusWeb/Click_and_learn/COVID19_Package_Insert_Rapid.pdf
What do you guys think happens in a normal flu year regarding cause of death? Do you think everyone that dies from influenza gets a H1N1 test to confirm it, otherwise some underlying condition they have get listed as the cause? NO. Cause of death is based on symptoms and as determined by the doctor.
The case with Covid is no different. People with underlying conditions that come in with Covid symptoms, end up in respiratory distress and die as a result get listed as Covid victims. That is NOT a conspiracy. That is how cause of death is regularly done.
What do you guys think happens in a normal flu year regarding cause of death? Do you think everyone that dies from influenza gets a H1N1 test to confirm it, otherwise some underlying condition they have get listed as the cause? NO. Cause of death is based on symptoms and as determined by the doctor.
The case with Covid is no different. People with underlying conditions that come in with Covid symptoms, end up in respiratory distress and die as a result get listed as Covid victims. That is NOT a conspiracy. That is how cause of death is regularly done.