What?This thread would be half the length if the pointless who is anti-what was taken out.
We are in the post-anti era. It doesn’t matter what anti you are, everybody is anti-something. So what if @michael94 is antisemite? Is @OldMan being anti-anti-semite, which he clearly is, any better? Why isn’t anyone calling him out on it?
For example I’m anti-neighbour. I mean I don’t care who you are or what color of skin or religion you are (though admittedly being black or muslim doesn’t help...though every white person feels that way) just the fact you live in my proximity is enough for me to be anti-you. Does that make me a bad a guy? Maybe. But so what?
Anti means you don’t like something. Everybody is entitled to dislike whatever they want, it’s called plurality of opinions, one of the signs of a free society.
If you're my neighbor, it bothers me that you're anti-neighbor. It matters also that if you're anti-Muslim and that you're anti-black. Especially if I'm a Muslim and I'm black. And that I have you as a neighbor. If all my neighbors are like you, I would not want to stay in that neighborhood.
Can you explain what you mean by a world that is post anti-? It doesn't seem to me that it is post- if there is still a lot of anti-'s around, as that is the state you're describing.
Or are you saying that it doesn't matter anymore if there are anti-isms? That people are now evolved well enough to think that it' s just ok to be anti- because it is all about freedom. The freedom to be anti- being part of that freedom?