x-ray peat
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,343
Thanks, very interesting paper. Ive gone back and forth on the importance of minerals in water. It's amazing how these scientists can have such strongly opposing views on something you'd think they would have figured out a long time ago.I never thought much of the water pH/mineralization debate until I found the work of L.C. Vincent cited in one of Ray Peat's articles. Are you familiar with it? Here's the relevant paper:
http://www.vieetaction.org/images/fougerousse/Presentation-BEV-anglais.pdf
It's quite elegant. Anyways, you will see from his reference table, where he compares the chemical properties of blood, urine, and saliva, that the electrical resistance of bodily fluids, and hence water, can vary dramatically. It's a function not just of dissolved minerals, but of total dissolved solids. He is saying that even municipal water supplies have dissolved solids in sufficient concentrations to cause disease. Not sure how it was in early 20ce Europe, but here in the United States, whenever I test a glass of tap water with my TDS meter, it usually contains somewhere between 50 and 300 parts per million of solids. By comparison, San Pellegrino is usually about 850. My well water growing up was somewhere in the middle, 500-600.
Im curious if Ray also thinks that inorganic minerals in water are dangerous and unusable.
Last edited: